Re: Feedback on implementation approaches

From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com<mailto:giuseppep@opera.com>>
Date: Thursday, December 5, 2013 7:40 AM
To: Bob Lund <b.lund@cablelabs.com<mailto:b.lund@cablelabs.com>>
Cc: "public-inbandtracks@w3.org<mailto:public-inbandtracks@w3.org>" <public-inbandtracks@w3.org<mailto:public-inbandtracks@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: Feedback on implementation approaches

an additional property could be better to avoid overloading the texttrack API

My thought also.

but as this is a change in the html5 spec I guess a comment from relevant HTML5 folks is needed here.

Silvia, what do you think?


/g


On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Bob Lund <B.Lund@cablelabs.com<mailto:B.Lund@cablelabs.com>> wrote:
Hi,

Does anyone have thoughts about the two implementation approaches I've described [1]? The second approach presumes a new track attribute which of course we'd have to get broader consensus on.

Thanks,
Bob

[1] http://www.w3.org/community/inbandtracks/wiki/Main_Page#Implementation_Approaches