On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 8:31 PM Rik Cabanier <rcabanier@magicleap.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 4:46 PM Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com> wrote: > >> Definite +1 to driving this in the IWCG. The focus on getting WebXR >> Device API out of the door will move to the soon-to-be-open-for-business >> Working Group, which should free up some time and focus in the CG. I'm >> personally pretty interested in driving some discussion in the CG for how >> we can get some model interop - i.e. rough standardization on asset type >> support, >> > > Yes, that is a good idea. We will likely have to talk to several group > within W3C to get a standard model type for the web. > Yup. And make no mistake, I don't expect we'll limit the web to one model type, but it would be good to get a baseline. As for the AR content, we can present what we currently implemented if > there's interest from the group. > I think that would be useful. > and I've poked in to what you've done in Helio and Prismatic. >> > > I'd love to hear what your thoughts are on our approach. Did you already > find the web inspector? :-) > I saw the support but haven't hooked it in yet. I did get a hub with mine, though, so I'm preparing. :) The browser UX had some... interesting choices. I think the ML-model design has some potential, though it seems pretty specific to headset AR scenario at first glance, and I think bridging across device scenarios will be one of the harder challenges here.
Received on Saturday, 18 August 2018 14:37:25 UTC