Re: Action Required: CFC, moving to a Living Spec Model for WebXR.

I support this proposal as well.

Best,
  Laszlo

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 5:24 PM Brandon Jones <bajones@google.com> wrote:

> I'm also in support of this proposal.
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 1:27 PM Rik Cabanier <cabanier@meta.com> wrote:
>
>> I support this proposal
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Ada Rose Cannon <adarose@apple.com>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 8, 2024 12:08 PM
>> *To:* public-immersive-web-wg@w3.org <public-immersive-web-wg@w3.org>
>> *Subject:* Action Required: CFC, moving to a Living Spec Model for WebXR.
>>
>> Hi Everyone, Following the discussion at TPAC (minutes) I am putting
>> forward the proposal for the WebXR Device API core spec and the WebXR
>> layers spec to move to a living spec model where there will be continuous
>> candidate recommendations published
>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
>> This Message Is From an External Sender
>>
>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> Following the discussion at TPAC (minutes
>> <https://www.w3.org/2024/03/26-immersive-web-minutes.html#t07>) I am
>> putting forward the proposal for the WebXR Device API core spec and the
>> WebXR layers spec to move to a living spec model where there will be
>> continuous candidate recommendations published with no expectation that the
>> spec will ever be fully “complete”. HTML follows a similar model. This
>> model makes sense for these 2 specs because they both need to deal with the
>> ever changing requirements of evolving XR hardware.
>>
>> These specs will still be limited to what is in the charter and candidate
>> recommendations will be published at intervals it won’t be a new
>> recommendation with every merged pull request but they will be updated
>> within a timely manner after a substantive change and will undergo the
>> various reviews.
>>
>> Please reply stating whether or not you approve or reject this proposal.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Ada Rose Cannon, Ayşegül Yonet and Chris Wilson
>> Immersive Web Chairs
>>
>