Re: Action Required: CFC, moving to a Living Spec Model for WebXR.

I'm also in support of this proposal.

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 1:27 PM Rik Cabanier <cabanier@meta.com> wrote:

> I support this proposal
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Ada Rose Cannon <adarose@apple.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 8, 2024 12:08 PM
> *To:* public-immersive-web-wg@w3.org <public-immersive-web-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Action Required: CFC, moving to a Living Spec Model for WebXR.
>
> Hi Everyone, Following the discussion at TPAC (minutes) I am putting
> forward the proposal for the WebXR Device API core spec and the WebXR
> layers spec to move to a living spec model where there will be continuous
> candidate recommendations published
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
> This Message Is From an External Sender
>
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Following the discussion at TPAC (minutes
> <https://www.w3.org/2024/03/26-immersive-web-minutes.html#t07>) I am
> putting forward the proposal for the WebXR Device API core spec and the
> WebXR layers spec to move to a living spec model where there will be
> continuous candidate recommendations published with no expectation that the
> spec will ever be fully “complete”. HTML follows a similar model. This
> model makes sense for these 2 specs because they both need to deal with the
> ever changing requirements of evolving XR hardware.
>
> These specs will still be limited to what is in the charter and candidate
> recommendations will be published at intervals it won’t be a new
> recommendation with every merged pull request but they will be updated
> within a timely manner after a substantive change and will undergo the
> various reviews.
>
> Please reply stating whether or not you approve or reject this proposal.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ada Rose Cannon, Ayşegül Yonet and Chris Wilson
> Immersive Web Chairs
>