Re: Wide Review for WebGPU and WGSL (prior to 15 October 2022)

I'm going to gracefully bow out of this review, since it represents a
conflict of interest for me (as both a WebXR and WebGPU editor). But I am
more than happy to answer any questions that the Immersive Web group may
have about WebGPU or pass the group's feedback along. I have tried to keep
both specs in mind while helping develop the other, so hopefully there are
no significant problems that come up.

--Brandon

On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 5:56 AM Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote:

> Dear Immersive Web Working Group,
>
> The GPU for the Web Working Group has made significant progress on first
> versions of the WebGPU and WebGPU Shading Language (WGSL)
> specifications. The group is now firming up the specifications with a
> view to requesting publication as Candidate Recommendations later this
> year.
>
> The Working Group would like to invite you to review the latest versions
> of the specifications:
>
> - WebGPU: https://www.w3.org/TR/webgpu/
> - WGSL: https://www.w3.org/TR/WGSL/
>
> Working drafts are updated on a continuous basis but there should be no
> more breaking changes at this stage. Feel free to review dated versions
> of the specifications to avoid looking at a moving target.
>
> Brandon prepared an explainer some time ago to lay out a plan for
> integrating WebGPU in WebXR [1]. If further changes to WebGPU seem
> warranted, now would be a good time to raise needs.
>
> The Working Group plans to request publication as Candidate
> Recommendations no sooner than 15 October 2022 and welcomes comments
> prior to that date, preferably through issues on the group's GitHub
> repository:
>    https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues
>
> Thanks,
> Francois - GPU for the Web WG staff contact
>
> [1]
>
> https://github.com/immersive-web/WebXR-WebGPU-Binding/blob/main/explainer.md
>
>