Re: Call for Consensus (CfC): First Published Working Draft of WebXR Device API

Consensus achieved! Let's go ahead and publish!

Ada

On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 11:26, Laszlo <laszlo.gombos@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for Samsung.  Exciting step forward.
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:31 PM Rik Cabanier <rcabanier@magicleap.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 from Magic Leap
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:04 AM Artem Bolgar <artem.bolgar@oculus.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for Oculus
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Kip Gilbert <kgilbert@mozilla.com>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 30, 2019 9:55:54 AM
>>> *To:* Waliczek, Nell; Chris Wilson; Dao Loc
>>> *Cc:* public-immersive-web-wg@w3.org; Ada Rose Edwards
>>> *Subject:* RE: Call for Consensus (CfC): First Published Working Draft
>>> of WebXR Device API
>>>
>>>
>>> +1 for Mozilla
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Waliczek, Nell <nhw@amazon.com>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 30, 2019 9:53:51 AM
>>> *To:* Chris Wilson; Dao Loc
>>> *Cc:* public-immersive-web-wg@w3.org; Ada Rose Edwards
>>> *Subject:* Re: Call for Consensus (CfC): First Published Working Draft
>>> of WebXR Device API
>>>
>>> +1 for Amazon
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Sent from Workspace ONE Boxer
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__whatisworkspaceone.com_boxer&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=QwmAf064EBX7njNklY4qw8YBkB2F3h6KxsqkytlX8qM&m=gOYSYMglXllgF1fjMraBYEhTxECjFvgWwNAUGWtLAqU&s=_LbnM3txrKqtiEdD_49fW8RPu_SM5BxtRyHwJchhUos&e=>
>>>
>>> On January 29, 2019 at 3:29:41 PM PST, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> (And for Google, +1.  :) )
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 1:00 PM Dao Loc <L.Dao@nfb.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 as well
>>>
>>> Sorry to miss the in person session next week.
>>>
>>> Loc
>>>
>>> On Jan 23, 2019, at 11:53 AM, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the WebXR Device API as a
>>> First Public Working Draft (FPWD) of the Immersive Web Working Group.
>>>
>>> The LT (aka the Chairs and Editors) have concluded that now is a good
>>> time to issue a First Published Working Draft
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_2018_Process-2D20180201_-23first-2Dwd&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=QwmAf064EBX7njNklY4qw8YBkB2F3h6KxsqkytlX8qM&m=gOYSYMglXllgF1fjMraBYEhTxECjFvgWwNAUGWtLAqU&s=qqwt_zDAEIQ6tTnmW-9q8yHFImJI7FT_nokntiuiQVY&e=> [1].
>>> Publication of a FPWD is a signal to the broader community that we are
>>> seeking review of the specification in its early stages, although the
>>> specification is specifically not being declared as complete at this time.
>>>
>>> We would like to invite responses on this thread (privately or publicly)
>>> from each Member company in the Working Group to declare their support for
>>> or statement against issuing the current draft in Github
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__immersive-2Dweb.github.io_webxr_&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=QwmAf064EBX7njNklY4qw8YBkB2F3h6KxsqkytlX8qM&m=gOYSYMglXllgF1fjMraBYEhTxECjFvgWwNAUGWtLAqU&s=CztkMh04TiKilOlFKbAVfgU7jPxOHfZY225sfbEnw30&e=> [2]
>>> as a First Published Working Draft.
>>>
>>> Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_2018_Process-2D20180201_-23def-2DConsensus&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=QwmAf064EBX7njNklY4qw8YBkB2F3h6KxsqkytlX8qM&m=gOYSYMglXllgF1fjMraBYEhTxECjFvgWwNAUGWtLAqU&s=5Xwqd0Bp164VfJXD1F65kx-Sar8xe57sP6JX6FeM9Hc&e=>
>>> [3], but positive responses are encouraged. Publication as a FPWD does NOT
>>> indicate that a document is complete or represent Working Group consensus.
>>> If there are no Formal Objections by *January 30th, 2019 *(1pm PDT),
>>> the proposal will carry and the Chairs will request that the Director
>>> approve publication as FPWD.
>>>
>>> The W3C Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore they
>>> typically require significant time and effort to address. Therefore, please
>>> limit any Formal Objections to issues related to the scope of these
>>> documents rather than technical content where the Working Group has not yet
>>> made a decision, or where the specification may not be complete or correct.
>>> Please include substantive arguments or rationale for consideration by the
>>> Director in any Formal Objection.
>>>
>>> If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs will contact the
>>> individual(s) who made the Formal Objection to see whether there are
>>> changes that would address the concern and increase consensus to publish.
>>> Depending on the number and nature of the Formal Objections, the Chairs
>>> will either make a decision either to pursue FPWD and report the Formal
>>> Objections to the Director (as required by W3C Process), or to postpone
>>> publication until there is greater consensus to publish.
>>>
>>> - Chris and Ada
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#first-wd
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_2018_Process-2D20180201_-23first-2Dwd&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=QwmAf064EBX7njNklY4qw8YBkB2F3h6KxsqkytlX8qM&m=gOYSYMglXllgF1fjMraBYEhTxECjFvgWwNAUGWtLAqU&s=qqwt_zDAEIQ6tTnmW-9q8yHFImJI7FT_nokntiuiQVY&e=>
>>> [2] https://immersive-web.github.io/webxr/
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__immersive-2Dweb.github.io_webxr_&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=QwmAf064EBX7njNklY4qw8YBkB2F3h6KxsqkytlX8qM&m=gOYSYMglXllgF1fjMraBYEhTxECjFvgWwNAUGWtLAqU&s=CztkMh04TiKilOlFKbAVfgU7jPxOHfZY225sfbEnw30&e=>
>>> [3] https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#def-Consensus
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_2018_Process-2D20180201_-23def-2DConsensus&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=QwmAf064EBX7njNklY4qw8YBkB2F3h6KxsqkytlX8qM&m=gOYSYMglXllgF1fjMraBYEhTxECjFvgWwNAUGWtLAqU&s=5Xwqd0Bp164VfJXD1F65kx-Sar8xe57sP6JX6FeM9Hc&e=>
>>>
>>>