Re: Call for Consensus (CfC): First Published Working Draft of WebXR Device API

+1 for Samsung.  Exciting step forward.

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:31 PM Rik Cabanier <rcabanier@magicleap.com>
wrote:

> +1 from Magic Leap
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:04 AM Artem Bolgar <artem.bolgar@oculus.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 for Oculus
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Kip Gilbert <kgilbert@mozilla.com>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 30, 2019 9:55:54 AM
>> *To:* Waliczek, Nell; Chris Wilson; Dao Loc
>> *Cc:* public-immersive-web-wg@w3.org; Ada Rose Edwards
>> *Subject:* RE: Call for Consensus (CfC): First Published Working Draft
>> of WebXR Device API
>>
>>
>> +1 for Mozilla
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Waliczek, Nell <nhw@amazon.com>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 30, 2019 9:53:51 AM
>> *To:* Chris Wilson; Dao Loc
>> *Cc:* public-immersive-web-wg@w3.org; Ada Rose Edwards
>> *Subject:* Re: Call for Consensus (CfC): First Published Working Draft
>> of WebXR Device API
>>
>> +1 for Amazon
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Sent from Workspace ONE Boxer
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__whatisworkspaceone.com_boxer&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=QwmAf064EBX7njNklY4qw8YBkB2F3h6KxsqkytlX8qM&m=gOYSYMglXllgF1fjMraBYEhTxECjFvgWwNAUGWtLAqU&s=_LbnM3txrKqtiEdD_49fW8RPu_SM5BxtRyHwJchhUos&e=>
>>
>> On January 29, 2019 at 3:29:41 PM PST, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> (And for Google, +1.  :) )
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 1:00 PM Dao Loc <L.Dao@nfb.ca> wrote:
>>
>> +1 as well
>>
>> Sorry to miss the in person session next week.
>>
>> Loc
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2019, at 11:53 AM, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the WebXR Device API as a
>> First Public Working Draft (FPWD) of the Immersive Web Working Group.
>>
>> The LT (aka the Chairs and Editors) have concluded that now is a good
>> time to issue a First Published Working Draft
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_2018_Process-2D20180201_-23first-2Dwd&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=QwmAf064EBX7njNklY4qw8YBkB2F3h6KxsqkytlX8qM&m=gOYSYMglXllgF1fjMraBYEhTxECjFvgWwNAUGWtLAqU&s=qqwt_zDAEIQ6tTnmW-9q8yHFImJI7FT_nokntiuiQVY&e=> [1].
>> Publication of a FPWD is a signal to the broader community that we are
>> seeking review of the specification in its early stages, although the
>> specification is specifically not being declared as complete at this time.
>>
>> We would like to invite responses on this thread (privately or publicly)
>> from each Member company in the Working Group to declare their support for
>> or statement against issuing the current draft in Github
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__immersive-2Dweb.github.io_webxr_&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=QwmAf064EBX7njNklY4qw8YBkB2F3h6KxsqkytlX8qM&m=gOYSYMglXllgF1fjMraBYEhTxECjFvgWwNAUGWtLAqU&s=CztkMh04TiKilOlFKbAVfgU7jPxOHfZY225sfbEnw30&e=> [2]
>> as a First Published Working Draft.
>>
>> Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_2018_Process-2D20180201_-23def-2DConsensus&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=QwmAf064EBX7njNklY4qw8YBkB2F3h6KxsqkytlX8qM&m=gOYSYMglXllgF1fjMraBYEhTxECjFvgWwNAUGWtLAqU&s=5Xwqd0Bp164VfJXD1F65kx-Sar8xe57sP6JX6FeM9Hc&e=>
>> [3], but positive responses are encouraged. Publication as a FPWD does NOT
>> indicate that a document is complete or represent Working Group consensus.
>> If there are no Formal Objections by *January 30th, 2019 *(1pm PDT), the
>> proposal will carry and the Chairs will request that the Director approve
>> publication as FPWD.
>>
>> The W3C Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore they
>> typically require significant time and effort to address. Therefore, please
>> limit any Formal Objections to issues related to the scope of these
>> documents rather than technical content where the Working Group has not yet
>> made a decision, or where the specification may not be complete or correct.
>> Please include substantive arguments or rationale for consideration by the
>> Director in any Formal Objection.
>>
>> If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs will contact the individual(s)
>> who made the Formal Objection to see whether there are changes that would
>> address the concern and increase consensus to publish. Depending on the
>> number and nature of the Formal Objections, the Chairs will either make a
>> decision either to pursue FPWD and report the Formal Objections to the
>> Director (as required by W3C Process), or to postpone publication until
>> there is greater consensus to publish.
>>
>> - Chris and Ada
>>
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#first-wd
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_2018_Process-2D20180201_-23first-2Dwd&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=QwmAf064EBX7njNklY4qw8YBkB2F3h6KxsqkytlX8qM&m=gOYSYMglXllgF1fjMraBYEhTxECjFvgWwNAUGWtLAqU&s=qqwt_zDAEIQ6tTnmW-9q8yHFImJI7FT_nokntiuiQVY&e=>
>> [2] https://immersive-web.github.io/webxr/
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__immersive-2Dweb.github.io_webxr_&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=QwmAf064EBX7njNklY4qw8YBkB2F3h6KxsqkytlX8qM&m=gOYSYMglXllgF1fjMraBYEhTxECjFvgWwNAUGWtLAqU&s=CztkMh04TiKilOlFKbAVfgU7jPxOHfZY225sfbEnw30&e=>
>> [3] https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#def-Consensus
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_2018_Process-2D20180201_-23def-2DConsensus&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=QwmAf064EBX7njNklY4qw8YBkB2F3h6KxsqkytlX8qM&m=gOYSYMglXllgF1fjMraBYEhTxECjFvgWwNAUGWtLAqU&s=5Xwqd0Bp164VfJXD1F65kx-Sar8xe57sP6JX6FeM9Hc&e=>
>>
>>