Re: Copying IIP documents to www.org/TR

Sounds good. Does that mean we should fork and continue the project work on
GitHub elsewhere on a non w3c repo?

Alolita

On Wed, May 27, 2020, 9:29 AM r12a <ishida@w3.org> wrote:

> dear IIP task force folks,
>
> I'd like to publish up-to-date copies of the IIP respec documents on the
> /TR space of the W3C server, so that people pointing to the documents can
> use www.org URLs, rather than GitHub ones to find the content.
>
> This means publishing a First Public Working Draft for the following
> documents.  Note that FPWD status indicates the beginning of work on a
> document; the document is not expected to be in a near final state.
>
> Bengali Gap Analysis
> https://w3c.github.io/iip/gap-analysis/beng-gap.html
>
> Devanagari Gap Analysis
> https://w3c.github.io/iip/gap-analysis/deva-gap.html
>
> Gurmukhi Gap Analysis
> https://w3c.github.io/iip/gap-analysis/guru-gap.html
>
> Gujarati Gap Analysis
> https://w3c.github.io/iip/gap-analysis/gujr-gap.html
>
> Tamil Gap Analysis
> https://w3c.github.io/iip/gap-analysis/taml-gap.html
>
> Tamil Layout Requirements
> https://w3c.github.io/iip/tamil/
>
>
> Unless there are objections from this group, i will recommend the
> publication to the Internationalization Working Group (which publishes IIP
> documents),  submit a transition request upon approval, and publish the
> documents.
>
> Going forward, we should regularly publish updates to the /TR space as
> changes accrue to the GitHub Editor's Draft. To facilitate that, we have
> the echidna tool, which makes publication relatively simple and quick.  We
> don't need to go through the Webmaster to publish ordinary Working Drafts
> (WDs) using echidna; we only need to follow that more complicated
> transition process for publication of a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
> or Working Group Note.  The policy of the Internationalisation WG, which
> publishes the documents for you, is to allow updates to the /TR space at
> the discretion of the editors of the document (no prior approval needed)
> for ordinary Working Draft updates.
>
> Please let me know by the end of this week if you have any objection to me
> proceeding with this.
>
> If i receive no objection, i'll move ahead.
>
> thanks,
> ri
>