Re: [url] Requests for Feedback (was Feedback from TPAC)

On 15/12/2014 15:25, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 12/15/2014 09:49 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:
>> It was just an editorial thing... I thought it might help if the WHATWG
>> "living standard" phrase and idea was given a sentence or two of
>> explanation in the section about the WHATWG specification.
>
> Thanks!  That makes sense.  Instead of either belaboring the point or not doing
> it justice, I opted for a hypertext link instead.  I've also applied this
> suggestion to the WebPlatform section.
>
> https://github.com/webspecs/url/commit/0b1aa691232c94e73da70023c89a0db53effb1a2
>
> http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url-problem-statement.html#rfc.section.2.2
>
> https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#What_does_.22Living_Standard.22_mean.3F

Works for me.  Thanks!

(If you publish as an RFC, the link may need to be more explicit, but that's 
more of a production detail.)

#g
--

Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 22:15:33 UTC