- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 01:18:39 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: public-ietf-w3c@w3.org
* Sam Ruby wrote: >What I am trying to do is distinguish between: > >1) I've read the draft, I approve of it, and therefore I have no comments. > >2) I've not read the draft, and therefore I have no comments. > >Despite the fact that there is no active WG within the IETF working on >this, I would have thought that this would be a topic of significant >interest to the broader IETF community. This would tend to argue for #1 >above, but I fear that the current state is #2. If I wanted something from the IETF community, I would try to respect their customs. You are welcome to make an IETF Contribution submitting your ideas as an Internet-Draft, for instance. Your sarcasm also does not help. I for my part have read the draft, do not know what it would mean to "approve of it", I do have comments, but I see no way to contribute them. One problem is that I would apparently have to waive "all copyright and related or neighbouring rights", or be singled out for not doing so in your proposal, wich I find unusual and inappropriate. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de D-10243 Berlin · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de Available for hire in Berlin (early 2015) · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Saturday, 6 December 2014 00:19:11 UTC