- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:06:46 -0400
- To: superuser@gmail.com, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, public-ietf-w3c <public-ietf-w3c@w3.org>
Dear Apps Area Chairs, IETF contact, and HTTP Chair, The Linked Data Platform WG is using a new response code to shortcut the common POST->303 Location:X, GET ->200 interaction. Eric Prud'hommeaux submitted a draft [2NN] before the last IETF meeting in Toronto, but Mark said that the HTTPbis WG is too busy to take this up and that we should take it to the Applications WG. The LDP Working Group is using 209 for its tests inside the LDP WG but it needs to ask for deployment outside of the Group so it need to draft something that assigns a code to 2NN. Does it make sense for us to include that in the test documentation, knowing that it essentially binds us to 209 in the future, or would it be better for us to re-draft 2nn as 209? Thank you, Philippe [2NN] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-prudhommeaux-http-status-2nn/
Received on Monday, 18 August 2014 14:06:50 UTC