- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:23:16 -0600
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, public-ietf-w3c <public-ietf-w3c@w3.org>
In Maastricht we had talked about having a coordination call on this topic. I'm just posting to say that I'm still interested such a call so that we can start a better conversation among all the relevant parties. On 8/4/10 7:18 AM, Thomas Roessler wrote: > hi Mark, > > I had forgotten to copy you on these. Probably worth keeping the > IETF liaison to OMA in the loop on the contacts piece. > > Active work on these coordination items is, at this point, in Cyrus' > and my hands. > > Cheers, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler) > > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> Date: 28 July 2010 12:21:33 >> GMT+02:00 To: W3C Device APIs and Policy WG >> <public-device-apis@w3.org> Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Cyrus >> Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Subject: Calendaring coordination >> >> I talked to some folks about calendaring in the hallways. The IETF >> calsify WG isn't currently active; most of the work has moved to >> the CalConnect consortium: http://www.calconnect.org/ >> >> Cyrus and I agreed to work toward a conversation between Calconnect >> and this WG about the lunisolar calendaring requirement. I'll >> follow up on that when I'm back form the IETF meeting. >> >> (ACTION-228) >> >> Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler) >> >> >> > > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> Date: 28 July 2010 12:15:37 >> GMT+02:00 To: W3C Device APIs and Policy WG >> <public-device-apis@w3.org> Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Harry >> Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> Subject: Next steps with vcard / POCO / >> OMA >> >> The IETF's vcard4 spec is through Working Group Last Call and going >> to be in IETF Last Call soon; that will be the last opportunity for >> us to review and comment on that work. Perhaps unsurprisingly, >> that WG is recommending that we use vcard4 as the underlying >> format, not PoCo. There is no current communication between that >> group and PoCo. >> >> I seem to have an action item to organize a joint conference call >> with the vcard4 folks some time soon; we should also try to invite >> Joseph Smarr and the OMA folks to that. >> >> Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler) >>
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2010 17:23:52 UTC