contacts / calendaring coordination

hi Mark,

I had forgotten to copy you on these.  Probably worth keeping the IETF liaison to OMA in the loop on the contacts piece.

Active work on these coordination items is, at this point, in Cyrus' and my hands.

Cheers,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)





Begin forwarded message:

> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
> Date: 28 July 2010 12:21:33 GMT+02:00
> To: W3C Device APIs and Policy WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
> Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
> Subject: Calendaring coordination
> 
> I talked to some folks about calendaring in the hallways.  The IETF calsify WG isn't currently active; most of the work has moved to the CalConnect consortium:
> 	http://www.calconnect.org/
> 
> Cyrus and I agreed to work toward a conversation between Calconnect and this WG about the lunisolar calendaring requirement.  I'll follow up on that when I'm back form the IETF meeting.
> 
> (ACTION-228)
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)
> 
> 
> 



Begin forwarded message:

> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
> Date: 28 July 2010 12:15:37 GMT+02:00
> To: W3C Device APIs and Policy WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
> Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
> Subject: Next steps with vcard / POCO / OMA
> 
> The IETF's vcard4 spec is through Working Group Last Call and going to be in IETF Last Call soon; that will be the last opportunity for us to review and comment on that work.  Perhaps unsurprisingly, that WG is recommending that we use vcard4 as the underlying format, not PoCo.  There is no current communication between that group and PoCo.
> 
> I seem to have an action item to organize a joint conference call with the vcard4 folks some time soon; we should also try to invite Joseph Smarr and the OMA folks to that.
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2010 13:18:51 UTC