- From: Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:16:11 -0400
- To: jon.peterson@neustar.biz, rai-ads@tools.ietf.org, app-ads@tools.ietf.org
- Cc: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>, rjs@nostrum.com, public-ietf-w3c@w3.org, Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com>, "Angel (amachin) Machin" <angel.machin@vodafone.com>
Dear Mr Peterson, Mr Jennings, Mrs Dusseault and Mr Newman, On behalf of the W3C Geolocation Working Group: With regard to your liaison statement of 21 Nov 2008; we acknowledge the design request of the GEOPRIV Working Group and have been discussing it within the Geolocation Working Group. The Geolocation WG withheld publishing the First Public Working Draft of the API document until hearing from GEOPRIV WG members. The Geolocation WG has not thus far been persuaded to adopt the solutions brought forth by the GEOPRIV members. This is being tracked at: http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/4 We have requested further feedback from the review community in the form of a note in a section of our draft entitled "Privacy considerations for recipients of location information", which is available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-geolocation-API-20081222/#privacy_for_ In addition we are currently tracking feedback on that section at: http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/5 Sincerely, -Matt Womer Geolocation WG Team Contact
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2009 17:47:27 UTC