- From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 20:42:40 +0100 (BST)
- To: John Stracke <JStracke@incentivesystems.com>
- cc: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, <ietf@ietf.org>, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, <public-ietf-w3c@w3.org>
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, John Stracke wrote: > >> Yesterday I participated in a W3C/IETF coordination > >> call where one of the topics was about the registration > >> of mime types defined by W3C Recommendations. A summary > >> of the meeting will be available soon to the W3C Membership. > > > >what about the IETF membership? > > Why would the process be any different for the W3C than for anybody > else? It is perfectly possible to have a MIME registration RFC that > references a non-IETF document for the actual syntax of the format. > For example, see RFC-3240. The W3C members pay good money to see that their formats become standards, dammit. To be clear, I am asking why the summary of the meeting will only be made available to the (closed, fee-paying) W3C membership. L. <http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>
Received on Sunday, 30 June 2002 10:14:40 UTC