Re: Request for consensus to add text in the BLM statement

I’m ok with the originally proposed change, but I prefer Marisa’s suggestion. So--

+0 on the original proposal.
+1 to Marisa’s addition of “against marginalized communities.”

Best,
Mateus


From: "Reid, Wendy" <wendy.reid@rakuten.com>
Date: Friday, August 21, 2020 at 5:58 AM
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@unlockopen.com>, Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com>
Cc: Inclusion and Diversity Community Group <public-idcg@w3.org>, Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com>, vagner <vagner@nic.br>
Subject: Re: Request for consensus to add text in the BLM statement
Resent-From: <public-idcg@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Friday, August 21, 2020 at 5:58 AM


EXTERNAL EMAIL
+1 to Marisa’s rewording

Get Outlook for iOS<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fo0ukef&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cccd8efdbb48f4b0f25c408d845d1e546%7C2916ea148f244be68a2d3afc0c7a4892%7C0%7C0%7C637336115080932473&sdata=vA5XM6wh01n35JbbM1Wy25T3d2Kl3GNGSfwwgWc0kGQ%3D&reserved=0>
________________________________
From: Tobie Langel <tobie@unlockopen.com>
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2020 7:09:32 AM
To: Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com>
Cc: Inclusion and Diversity Community Group <public-idcg@w3.org>; Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com>; vagner <vagner@nic.br>
Subject: Re: Request for consensus to add text in the BLM statement

+1 to Marisa’s rewording too.

—tobie

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:39 Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com<mailto:dan@torgo.com>> wrote:
I was Ok with the original proposal, and definite +1 to the Marisa's proposed rewording.



Dan



‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, 20 August 2020 23:36, vagner <vagner@nic.br<mailto:vagner@nic.br>> wrote:

Much better this addition.

Vagner.



Enviado do meu Samsung Mobile da Claro


-------- Mensagem original --------
De : Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com<mailto:marisa.demeglio@gmail.com>>
Data: 20/08/2020 18:56 (GMT-03:00)
Para: Inclusion and Diversity Community Group <public-idcg@w3.org<mailto:public-idcg@w3.org>>
Assunto: Re: Request for consensus to add text in the BLM statement

-1

I am afraid of our statement having a subtext that equates endorsing BLM with endorsing violence. Because otherwise why would we feel the need to add that line? This was never supposed to be a statement about all the things we support and don’t support. It’s specifically a statement of support for BLM.

I would however be happy with adding this:
"We unequivocally stand against racism, injustice, and violence against marginalized communities.”

Marisa

> On Aug 20, 2020, at 10:47, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org<mailto:swick@w3.org>> wrote:
>
> IDCG Participants,
>
> As you know, the W3C Process allows for formal objections to a group decision.  A formal objection is a request to the W3C Director to consider when evaluating the related decision.
>
> During the W3C Member review of the proposed W3C Statement on Black Lives Matter a formal objection was raised.  I have been delegated to try to find a consensus resolution to this formal objection on behalf
> of the W3C Director.
>
> I share with you part of the objector's statement and following that a change (addition) to the text of the BLM statement. The objector has confirmed that this would resolve the objection to their satisfaction.
>
> Quoting from the objector's statement:
>
> "I believe it is important to clearly state what we _do_ and _do not_
> support as W3C organization. We support true equality, we support any
> lawful action that aims to fight injustice, but we do not condone
> violence or destruction of property. In numerous cases, the peaceful
> protests for right social cause were hijacked by radical extremists,
> and their violent actions [that clearly deviate from the established
> social norms and the rule of law] only diminish the importance of
> "Black Lives Matter" message. I do not believe that being vocal about
> the rightful cause while being silent about radical violations of
> social norms sends the right message - we all know too well that
> silence is approval. We do not tolerate any behaviors that violate
> our own social norms, we openly speak against any violations of the
> W3C Code of Conduct - I do not see why our stance on the larger
> social issue should be any different.
>
> "Our stated position should clearly communicate the fact that while
> we do support all marginalized and underrepresented communities, and
> we support their fight for true equality, we do not condone any
> violence or unlawful actions!"
>
> The objector states they will withdraw their Formal Objection to the proposed statement if the following sentence is incorporated into paragraph 6:
>
>  "As an organization, W3C believes that Black Lives Matter.
>  /+We unequivocally stand against racism, injustice, and violence.+/
>  We also stand in support of our Indigenous colleagues, colleagues
>  of color, LGBTQI+ colleagues, and colleagues with disabilities.
>
> I solicit your view on this change, preferably no later than 27 August.
>
> Regards,
> Ralph Swick, W3C
>