- From: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 22:21:40 +0200
- To: public-idcg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <7260b996-f290-c618-1ab4-061e542824e0@sidar.org>
+1 /Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo/ Patrono Fundador y Directora General Fundación Sidar - Acceso Universal email: emmanuelle@sidar.org http://sidar.org El 20/08/2020 a las 22:18, Annette Greiner escribió: > > +1 for the addition. > > On 8/20/20 11:30 AM, Hochgesang, Barbara wrote: >> >> + 1 good compromise. >> >> *Barbara Hochgesang* >> >> *From:* Julien Tanay <julien.tanay@consensys.net> >> *Sent:* Thursday, August 20, 2020 11:11 AM >> *To:* Reid, Wendy <wendy.reid@rakuten.com> >> *Cc:* lwatson@tetralogical.com; Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>; >> public-idcg@w3.org; Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org> >> *Subject:* Re: Request for consensus to add text in the BLM statement >> >> + 1 from me too. >> >> Le jeu. 20 août 2020 à 20:07, Reid, Wendy <wendy.reid@rakuten.com >> <mailto:wendy.reid@rakuten.com>> a écrit : >> >> +1 to the proposed change. >> >> On 2020-08-20, 1:57 PM, "Léonie Watson" >> <lwatson@tetralogical.com <mailto:lwatson@tetralogical.com>> wrote: >> >> +1 to the proposed change. >> >> >> On 20/08/2020 18:47, Ralph Swick wrote: >> > IDCG Participants, >> > >> > As you know, the W3C Process allows for formal objections >> to a group >> > decision. A formal objection is a request to the W3C >> Director to >> > consider when evaluating the related decision. >> > >> > During the W3C Member review of the proposed W3C Statement >> on Black >> > Lives Matter a formal objection was raised. I have been >> delegated to >> > try to find a consensus resolution to this formal objection >> on behalf >> > of the W3C Director. >> > >> > I share with you part of the objector's statement and >> following that a >> > change (addition) to the text of the BLM statement. The >> objector has >> > confirmed that this would resolve the objection to their >> satisfaction. >> > >> > Quoting from the objector's statement: >> > >> > "I believe it is important to clearly state what we _do_ >> and _do not_ >> > support as W3C organization. We support true equality, we >> support any >> > lawful action that aims to fight injustice, but we do not >> condone >> > violence or destruction of property. In numerous cases, >> the peaceful >> > protests for right social cause were hijacked by radical >> extremists, >> > and their violent actions [that clearly deviate from the >> established >> > social norms and the rule of law] only diminish the >> importance of >> > "Black Lives Matter" message. I do not believe that being >> vocal about >> > the rightful cause while being silent about radical >> violations of >> > social norms sends the right message - we all know too >> well that >> > silence is approval. We do not tolerate any behaviors >> that violate >> > our own social norms, we openly speak against any >> violations of the >> > W3C Code of Conduct - I do not see why our stance on the >> larger >> > social issue should be any different. >> > >> > "Our stated position should clearly communicate the fact >> that while >> > we do support all marginalized and underrepresented >> communities, and >> > we support their fight for true equality, we do not >> condone any >> > violence or unlawful actions!" >> > >> > The objector states they will withdraw their Formal >> Objection to the >> > proposed statement if the following sentence is >> incorporated into >> > paragraph 6: >> > >> > "As an organization, W3C believes that Black Lives Matter. >> > /+We unequivocally stand against racism, injustice, and >> violence.+/ >> > We also stand in support of our Indigenous colleagues, >> colleagues >> > of color, LGBTQI+ colleagues, and colleagues with >> disabilities. >> > >> > I solicit your view on this change, preferably no later >> than 27 August. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Ralph Swick, W3C >> >> -- >> Director @TetraLogical >> https://tetralogical.com >> > -- > Annette Greiner (she) > NERSC Data and Analytics Services > Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory -- El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Received on Thursday, 20 August 2020 20:21:58 UTC