- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:18:56 -0700
- To: public-idcg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <a4f8f3eb-f63d-70c2-26d4-55267c5a49be@lbl.gov>
+1 for the addition. On 8/20/20 11:30 AM, Hochgesang, Barbara wrote: > > + 1 good compromise. > > *Barbara Hochgesang* > > *From:* Julien Tanay <julien.tanay@consensys.net> > *Sent:* Thursday, August 20, 2020 11:11 AM > *To:* Reid, Wendy <wendy.reid@rakuten.com> > *Cc:* lwatson@tetralogical.com; Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>; > public-idcg@w3.org; Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: Request for consensus to add text in the BLM statement > > + 1 from me too. > > Le jeu. 20 août 2020 à 20:07, Reid, Wendy <wendy.reid@rakuten.com > <mailto:wendy.reid@rakuten.com>> a écrit : > > +1 to the proposed change. > > On 2020-08-20, 1:57 PM, "Léonie Watson" <lwatson@tetralogical.com > <mailto:lwatson@tetralogical.com>> wrote: > > +1 to the proposed change. > > > On 20/08/2020 18:47, Ralph Swick wrote: > > IDCG Participants, > > > > As you know, the W3C Process allows for formal objections to > a group > > decision. A formal objection is a request to the W3C > Director to > > consider when evaluating the related decision. > > > > During the W3C Member review of the proposed W3C Statement > on Black > > Lives Matter a formal objection was raised. I have been > delegated to > > try to find a consensus resolution to this formal objection > on behalf > > of the W3C Director. > > > > I share with you part of the objector's statement and > following that a > > change (addition) to the text of the BLM statement. The > objector has > > confirmed that this would resolve the objection to their > satisfaction. > > > > Quoting from the objector's statement: > > > > "I believe it is important to clearly state what we _do_ > and _do not_ > > support as W3C organization. We support true equality, we > support any > > lawful action that aims to fight injustice, but we do not > condone > > violence or destruction of property. In numerous cases, > the peaceful > > protests for right social cause were hijacked by radical > extremists, > > and their violent actions [that clearly deviate from the > established > > social norms and the rule of law] only diminish the > importance of > > "Black Lives Matter" message. I do not believe that being > vocal about > > the rightful cause while being silent about radical > violations of > > social norms sends the right message - we all know too > well that > > silence is approval. We do not tolerate any behaviors that > violate > > our own social norms, we openly speak against any > violations of the > > W3C Code of Conduct - I do not see why our stance on the > larger > > social issue should be any different. > > > > "Our stated position should clearly communicate the fact > that while > > we do support all marginalized and underrepresented > communities, and > > we support their fight for true equality, we do not > condone any > > violence or unlawful actions!" > > > > The objector states they will withdraw their Formal > Objection to the > > proposed statement if the following sentence is incorporated > into > > paragraph 6: > > > > "As an organization, W3C believes that Black Lives Matter. > > /+We unequivocally stand against racism, injustice, and > violence.+/ > > We also stand in support of our Indigenous colleagues, > colleagues > > of color, LGBTQI+ colleagues, and colleagues with > disabilities. > > > > I solicit your view on this change, preferably no later than > 27 August. > > > > Regards, > > Ralph Swick, W3C > > -- > Director @TetraLogical > https://tetralogical.com > -- Annette Greiner (she) NERSC Data and Analytics Services Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Received on Thursday, 20 August 2020 20:19:13 UTC