- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 10:01:18 -0400
- To: lw@tetralogical.com, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, public-idcg@w3.org
On 3/29/2019 9:58 AM, Léonie Watson wrote: > On 29/03/2019 12:28, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: >> Is this data set large enough to allow anonymity? Is such data the >> only/ideal way to "measure" how we preform on ensuring diversity? I >> personally feel somewhat ambivalent about such data collection. > > I'm not sure how many participants we have within W3C but it counts in > the thousands, so I think the sample set would be large enough, yes. If we include CG participants, then the community is >10,000 people. > > The purpose of this exercise is more about understanding where we are, > than it is about ensuring we do better. > > That said, if you have other ideas about how we can gauge our current > diversity, in order to ensure we keep improving it, that'd be welcome. > > Léonie. > >> >> 2 cents, >> Shadi >> >> >> On 29/03/2019 12:08, Léonie Watson wrote: >>> Everyone, >>> >>> At the meeting during TPAC we agreed we wanted to know more about >>> the current state of diversity at W3C. I'd like us to make a start >>> on this if we can. >>> >>> I think the only way to collect this information is to ask people, >>> and to ask them in a way that protects their anonymity. I might be >>> wrong about this of course, there may be much better ways! >>> >>> If this is the right approach though, we'll need to find a platform >>> to host the survey that protects people's privacy, and to design a >>> set of questions to ask. >>> >>> If anyone has ideas on how to approach this activity, ideas about >>> platforms, or experience of designing the appropriate questions, >>> that would be very welcome. >>> >>> Léonie. >> >
Received on Friday, 29 March 2019 14:01:27 UTC