- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 12:33:25 -0400
- To: lw@tetralogical.com, "Reid, Wendy" <wendy.reid@rakuten.com>, "Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile" <charles.nevile@consensys.net>, "public-idcg@w3.org" <public-idcg@w3.org>
I would ask people to email me. On 7/26/2019 12:22 PM, Léonie Watson wrote: > On the basis there is some interest in this idea, I've been thinking > about the logistics. > > It has to be easy for people to manage their availability, and the > amount of time they're able to make available. It also has to be easy > for people to agree a time to speak. > > It seems likely that each volunteer will have their preferred way to > manage their time, and for arranging times to talk with people, so a > simple approach might be our best bet? > > > One possibility is a page that we point people to, where the names and > preferred contact methods of each volunteer are shown. > > I use a service called Calendly (calendly.com) to manage the open > office hours I already hold. It plugs into my calendar service > (Google), and lets me create meeting types (30 minutes twice a week > for example). > > I then share the URL for the meeting type, and people can choose from > the available 30 minute slots. When the limit of two a week is > reached, the rest of my time is automatically marked as unavailable. > > Calendly bases my availability on my Google calendar, so it's > essential that stays up to date. When a meeting is requested, it > automatically adds it to my Google calendar, and sends me an email to > let me know. > > > So my information on the page I'm suggesting might be something like > this: > > Léonie Watson: use [calendly] to find a time to talk about W3C. > > Someone else might prefer to use another meeting management service, > or to arrange metings by email, and would then share their email > address or other preferred point of initial contact. > > We could also include a bit of information about where each volunteer > is involved at W3C perhaps? > > Léonie. > > On 26/07/2019 14:58, Reid, Wendy wrote: >> I love this idea and would happily offer up some time! >> >> -Wendy >> >> On 2019-07-26, 4:54 AM, "Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile" >> <charles.nevile@consensys.net> wrote: >> >> Seems like a good idea, and I would find some time to do that. >> cheers >> Chaals >> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 10:29:32 +0200, Léonie Watson >> <lw@tetralogical.com> >> wrote: >> > Everyone, >> > >> > When discussing the diversity fund with the selection >> committee, I had >> > an idea... >> > >> > Enabling people to go to TPAC is a worthwhile thing for W3C to >> do, but >> > TPAC itself is a tough introduction to W3C for anyone who >> isn't already >> > participating in some way. >> > >> > Each week, I make two 30 minute slots available in my >> calendar, and >> > anyone who wants to talk about accessibility or inclusive >> design, is >> > welcome to take one of those slots. I post my calendar on >> Twitter and a >> > couple of other forums, so the meetings are open to anyone >> (though I do >> > set some basic ground rules like no selling, and that I make no >> > commitment to doing homework after any call). This isn't about >> creating >> > business, it isn't a paid service, it's a community thing >> designed to >> > help people out. I borrowed the idea from Matt May at Adobe >> (another >> > accessibility person), and I daresay he borrowed it from >> someone else >> > too. >> > >> > One of my forthcoming office hours meetings is with someone >> who wants to >> > know how to get involved in the ARIA WG. >> > >> > Which makes me wonder if we could create a Poole of volunteers >> willing >> > to give up 30 minutes of their time, perhaps once a month, to >> talk to >> > people from under-represented groups who would like to get >> involved at >> > W3C but don't really know where to start. >> > >> > I don't know how we'd manage it logistically, but if the idea >> has enough >> > support here, we could think about that next. >> > >> > Léonie. >> > >> > >> > >> -- >> Charles "chaals" Nevile >> PegaSys Standards Architect, ConsenSys >> >
Received on Friday, 26 July 2019 16:33:28 UTC