- From: Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:32:36 +0100
- To: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net
- Cc: public-idcg@w3.org
Yeah, I agree that we don't want to make people think these are "genius grants". That's just one of the problems I found in the wording I put up. It really is a straw person. cheers On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 23:09:07 +0100, <deborah.kaplan@suberic.net> wrote: > I like this approach very much. I'd be inclined not to ask people what > meetings they intend to participate in; I think this might give some > people the idea that they have to be amazing perfect stellar > participants to be considered worthy, and also, might discourage > newbies. But the approach of saying, "we know there are some groups who > are clearly underrepresented, but we're telling you the list so you'll > have a sense of why we're doing this and whether you're a good > applicant" is a good one. > > Deborah > >> [[[ >> The purpose of the scholarships are to increase diversity of >> perspectives >> offered in discussion, by supporting attendance from people who >> otherwise >> could not participate in the event. The selection criteria will focus on >> bringing new or under-represented individual perspectives rather than >> attempting to balance the presence of specific "groups" or communities. >> >> To apply, you will be asked to provide a couple of sentences explaining >> the >> perspectives you bring, and the specific meetings you intend to >> participate >> in. >> >> As typical for many US-headquartered technical organisations, there are >> many >> under-represented communities in W3C. Communities who are obviously who >> are >> under-represented include women, people from Africa, the Middle East, >> Central >> and South America, Central, South and South-East Asia, refugees and >> people >> providing support to refugees, and people with disabilities - especially >> those who need support for an assistant or carer. >> >> The program is still experimental, and we encourage feedback on what >> works >> well and what needs improvement to help us achieve our goals. This is >> welcome >> either anonymously or as a public contribution. >> ] ] ] >> >> cheers >> >> Chaals >> >> On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 10:24:47 +0100, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Oana. >>> >>> I'd like to put this proposal to a Call For Consensus (CFC), but it >>> would >>> be good to get a sense of other people's thoughts on this idea first. >>> >>> Léonie. >>> >>> >>> On 19/12/2018 18:02, Oana Galbenu wrote: >>> > Sound good to me. And pretty elegant I would say. >>> > Best, >>> > Oana >>> > On Wed, 19 Dec 2018, 19:50 Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk >>> > <mailto:tink@tink.uk> wrote: >>> > I was talking about this with another person recently, and they >>> > suggested that we may not need to identify individual >>> > under-represented >>> > groups, but could just make it clear that the diversity >>> scholarship >>> > is >>> > open to anyone who believes they are from an under-represented >>> group. >>> > It would mean that we don't have to be specific about which >>> > under-represented groups are included (and which are not), and it >>> > removes the risk of us excluding anyone because we accidentally >>> left >>> > their particular group off the list. >>> > It would also mean that we don't need to ask people to identify >>> which >>> > under-represented group they belong to. >>> > It may mean that some people try to game the system, but W3 is a >>> > small >>> > enough community that I think anyone trying to do that would >>> quickly >>> > be >>> > found-out. >>> > It may also mean that we cannot guarantee diversity within the >>> group >>> > of >>> > people selected to receive scholarships, but given the relatively >>> > small >>> > number of scholarships likely to be awarded, it may be enough >>> that >>> > we're >>> > helping people from any under-represented groups. >>> > Thoughts? >>> > Léonie. >>> > -- @LeonieWatson tink.uk <http://tink.uk> Carpe diem >>> > >>> >> >> >> > > -- -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Wednesday, 2 January 2019 23:33:09 UTC