Re: U+1824/U+1826 F+FVS2 tick

Change made at http://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/variants#char1826

ri


On 24/12/2015 01:30, Greg Eck wrote:
> Thanks Badral.
>
> We will get it fixed.
>
> Greg
>
> *>>>>>*
>
> *Sent:*Thursday, December 24, 2015 8:16 AM
> *Subject:* Re: U+1824/U+1826 F+FVS2 tick
>
> The tick (better drop) should be equal to the dot of NA. So, the glyph
> used by White is correct.
>
> Badral
>
> On 23.12.2015 16:31, Greg Eck wrote:
>
>     Badral,
>
>     Could you look at the font Comparator Site U+1826 F+FVS2?
>
>     Compare the glyph used for Baiti with the glyph used by White.
>
>     The Baiti tick goes down and the White tick goes up.
>
>     Which is correct?
>
>     Others comment also, please.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Greg
>
>>>>>>
>

Received on Thursday, 24 December 2015 09:28:34 UTC