- From: siqin <siqin@almas.co.jp>
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:53:32 +0900
- To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>, "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 23 October 2015 05:53:52 UTC
Hi Greg, according to the circled(green) form of manchu_zha02.jpg sibe_zha02_children.jpg sibe_zha13_teacher.jpg sibe zha(1872) and manchu zha(1877) must be sibe_manchu_zha.jpg I think. SiqinBilige. On 2015/10/23 12:38, Greg Eck wrote: > > Could you help me by giving me a snip image of each? > > Thanks, > > Greg > > *>>>>>* > > *Sent:*Friday, October 23, 2015 11:07 AM > *Subject:* Re: 1877 - Manchu advice needed > > But, the middle form of sibe and manchu is not same. > manchu_zha02.jpg > sibe_zha13_teacher.jpg > So, it is better to have two middle forms of zha(U+1877), I think. > > > I didn't realize that there is sibe zha(1872). > never mind. > > SiqinBilige. > > >>>>> >
Received on Friday, 23 October 2015 05:53:52 UTC