- From: siqin <siqin@almas.co.jp>
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:53:32 +0900
- To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>, "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 23 October 2015 05:53:52 UTC
Hi Greg,
according to the circled(green) form of
manchu_zha02.jpg
sibe_zha02_children.jpg
sibe_zha13_teacher.jpg
sibe zha(1872) and manchu zha(1877) must be
sibe_manchu_zha.jpg
I think.
SiqinBilige.
On 2015/10/23 12:38, Greg Eck wrote:
>
> Could you help me by giving me a snip image of each?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Greg
>
> *>>>>>*
>
> *Sent:*Friday, October 23, 2015 11:07 AM
> *Subject:* Re: 1877 - Manchu advice needed
>
> But, the middle form of sibe and manchu is not same.
> manchu_zha02.jpg
> sibe_zha13_teacher.jpg
> So, it is better to have two middle forms of zha(U+1877), I think.
>
>
> I didn't realize that there is sibe zha(1872).
> never mind.
>
> SiqinBilige.
>
> >>>>>
>
Received on Friday, 23 October 2015 05:53:52 UTC