RE: U+1842

Hi Greg,



It is Ok to take the glyph with tail. Because we know that there are no real
usage of this isolate form or we can ignore this difference.



Thanks and Regards,





Jirimutu

===============================================================

Almas Inc.

101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp>    Mobile : 090-6174-6115

Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082

http://www.almas.co.jp/   http://www.compiere-japan.com/

http://www.mongolfont.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------

Inner Mongolia Delehi Information Technology Co. Ltd.

010010 13th floor of Uiles Hotel, No 89 XinHua east street XinCheng
District, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia

Mail:  jirimutu@delehi.com <mailto:jirimutu@delehi.com>
Mobile:18647152148

Phone:  +86-471-6661969,      Ofiice: +86-471-6661995

http://www.delehi.com/

===============================================================



From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 4:52 PM
To: jrmt@almas.co.jp; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: U+1842



Jirimutu,



Would you like to argue for the difference between the White isolate and the
other font’s forms without the tail? If this is not significant to you,
then we will mark it green and go on.



Thanks,
Greg

Received on Thursday, 15 October 2015 09:28:52 UTC