W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > July to September 2015

Re: Emailing: Isolate Comparision between fonts.docx

From: Badral S. <badral@bolorsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:47:33 +0200
To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Message-ID: <56090CB5.2050705@bolorsoft.com>
Hi,
Here is the suggestion of Mr. Jamyansuren. He also voted for BS & MS 
variants.

Badral

On 27.09.2015 12:08, Greg Eck wrote:
>
> Jirimutu,
>
> Yes, if you could send the group some textbook images showing the 
> teaching of the 
> cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0, 
> that would be helpful.
>
> If we look at the Todo, we find the FangZhen font has one difference. 
> I am asking the Fangzhen engineer to comment on this now also.
>
> But, can you tell us why the White font uses the initial in U+184F and 
> U+1859? Why would you say that this this correct – especially in light 
> of the other fonts’ shaping differences?
>
> Greg
>
> >>>>>
>
> ·What do we print on a keyboard for these four letters? I would think 
> it would be 
> cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image006.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image008.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0. 
>
>
> Yes, for identification.
>
> ·What shaping do you get for the sequence 
> <U+1823><SPACE><U+1824><SPACE><U+1825><SPACE><U+1826>? If we give the 
> shaping as be 
> cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0how 
> do we answer the pupil when he/she asks why there is a difference?
>
> It is the true, we are all teaching pupil in this way until now.
>
> ·When we are teaching the alphabet in the classroom, do we teach 
> cid:image005.jpg@01D0F85E.F3909EE0cid:image006.jpg@01D0F85E.F3909EE0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F85E.F3909EE0cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0 or 
> cid:image005.jpg@01D0F85E.F3909EE0cid:image006.jpg@01D0F85E.F3909EE0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F85E.F3909EE0cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image006.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image008.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0? 
>
>
> It is the first group. We can provide some text book copy next week.
>
> ·It would seem very strange to be giving instruction where you are 
> teaching two different letters with exactly the same form.
>
> Yes, it is. But it is the Traditional Mongolian writing.
>
> Actually, the Todo, Manchu is created for removing these kind of 
> ambiguous writing forms (two or four character have same writing mode).
>
> But when we define the Unicde code point, we selected some characters 
> like https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/185Df.png, 
> https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/185Em1.png, 
> https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1861m.pnghttps://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1863f.pnghttps://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1873m2.pnghttps://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1874f.pngfor 
> Sibe and Manchu.
>
> All of these form is not the isolate form actually.
>
> >>>>>
>


-- 
Badral Sanlig, Software architect
www.bolorsoft.com | www.badral.net
Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar


picture
(image/jpeg attachment: 01-part)

Received on Monday, 28 September 2015 09:48:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:07:05 UTC