- From: Badral S. <badral@bolorsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:47:33 +0200
- To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
- Message-ID: <56090CB5.2050705@bolorsoft.com>
Hi, Here is the suggestion of Mr. Jamyansuren. He also voted for BS & MS variants. Badral On 27.09.2015 12:08, Greg Eck wrote: > > Jirimutu, > > Yes, if you could send the group some textbook images showing the > teaching of the > cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0, > that would be helpful. > > If we look at the Todo, we find the FangZhen font has one difference. > I am asking the Fangzhen engineer to comment on this now also. > > But, can you tell us why the White font uses the initial in U+184F and > U+1859? Why would you say that this this correct – especially in light > of the other fonts’ shaping differences? > > Greg > > >>>>> > > ·What do we print on a keyboard for these four letters? I would think > it would be > cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image006.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image008.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0. > > > Yes, for identification. > > ·What shaping do you get for the sequence > <U+1823><SPACE><U+1824><SPACE><U+1825><SPACE><U+1826>? If we give the > shaping as be > cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0how > do we answer the pupil when he/she asks why there is a difference? > > It is the true, we are all teaching pupil in this way until now. > > ·When we are teaching the alphabet in the classroom, do we teach > cid:image005.jpg@01D0F85E.F3909EE0cid:image006.jpg@01D0F85E.F3909EE0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F85E.F3909EE0cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0 or > cid:image005.jpg@01D0F85E.F3909EE0cid:image006.jpg@01D0F85E.F3909EE0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F85E.F3909EE0cid:image005.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image006.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image007.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0cid:image008.jpg@01D0F843.DC45E5D0? > > > It is the first group. We can provide some text book copy next week. > > ·It would seem very strange to be giving instruction where you are > teaching two different letters with exactly the same form. > > Yes, it is. But it is the Traditional Mongolian writing. > > Actually, the Todo, Manchu is created for removing these kind of > ambiguous writing forms (two or four character have same writing mode). > > But when we define the Unicde code point, we selected some characters > like https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/185Df.png, > https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/185Em1.png, > https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1861m.pnghttps://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1863f.pnghttps://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1873m2.pnghttps://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1874f.pngfor > Sibe and Manchu. > > All of these form is not the isolate form actually. > > >>>>> > -- Badral Sanlig, Software architect www.bolorsoft.com | www.badral.net Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: ________________________________________.jpg
Received on Monday, 28 September 2015 09:48:43 UTC