- From: <jrmt@almas.co.jp>
- Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 00:15:07 +0900
- To: "'Greg Eck'" <greck@postone.net>, <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <000001d0f86e$2122bc80$63683580$@almas.co.jp>
Hi Greg, * What do we print on a keyboard for these four letters? I would think it would be . Yes, for identification. * What shaping do you get for the sequence <U+1823><SPACE><U+1824><SPACE><U+1825><SPACE><U+1826>? If we give the shaping as be how do we answer the pupil when he/she asks why there is a difference? It is the true, we are all teaching pupil in this way until now. * When we are teaching the alphabet in the classroom, do we teach or ? It is the first group. We can provide some text book copy next week. * It would seem very strange to be giving instruction where you are teaching two different letters with exactly the same form. Yes, it is. But it is the Traditional Mongolian writing. Actually, the Todo, Manchu is created for removing these kind of ambiguous writing forms (two or four character have same writing mode). But when we define the Unicde code point, we selected some characters like , , for Sibe and Manchu. All of these form is not the isolate form actually. Thanks and best Regards, Jirimutu =============================================================== Almas Inc. 101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> Mobile : 090-6174-6115 Phone : 03-5688-2081, Fax : 03-5688-2082 http://www.almas.co.jp/ http://www.compiere-japan.com/ http://www.mongolfont.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------- Inner Mongolia Delehi Information Technology Co. Ltd. 010010 13th floor of Uiles Hotel, No 89 XinHua east street XinCheng District, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Mail: jirimutu@delehi.com <mailto:jirimutu@delehi.com> Mobile:18647152148 Phone: +86-471-6661969, Ofiice: +86-471-6661995 http://www.delehi.com/ =============================================================== From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net] Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 4:51 PM To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org; jrmt@almas.co.jp Subject: Emailing: Isolate Comparision between fonts.docx The last listing showing the Isolate Comparison by font had the red circling mal-formed. I am correcting that by using a pdf To show the differences. I suggest that the Todo differences are not that significant as there are only three once-off occurrences. The AliGali is identical in all fonts so there is no discussion needed there. The Mongolian 1823/1824/1825/1826 situation still stands discussion. My questions are * What do we print on a keyboard for these four letters? I would think it would be . What shaping do you get for the sequence <U+1823><SPACE><U+1824><SPACE><U+1825><SPACE><U+1826>? If we give the shaping as be how do we answer the pupil when he/she asks why there is a difference? * When we are teaching the alphabet in the classroom, do we teach or ? It would seem very strange to be giving instruction where you are teaching two different letters with exactly the same form. The Sibe / Manchu script differences raise the same questions as the Mongolian. Greg
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: image001.jpg
- image/jpeg attachment: image002.jpg
- image/jpeg attachment: image003.jpg
- image/jpeg attachment: image004.jpg
- image/jpeg attachment: image005.jpg
- image/jpeg attachment: image006.jpg
- image/jpeg attachment: image007.jpg
- image/png attachment: image016.png
- image/png attachment: image017.png
- image/png attachment: image018.png
- image/png attachment: image019.png
- image/png attachment: image020.png
- image/png attachment: image021.png
Received on Saturday, 26 September 2015 15:15:40 UTC