W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > July to September 2015

RE: Reference Scheme for Mongolian Rendering

From: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:14:24 +0000
To: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com>, "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BN3PR10MB0321FA9EE11D640C7B8F81B0AF7C0@BN3PR10MB0321.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Richard, 

Attached please find the rules for the four over-rides.
I did this a bit fast, everyone please look over carefully to see if I made a mistake.


-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Wordingham [mailto:richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 8:56 AM
To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: Reference Scheme for Mongolian Rendering

Looking at Greg's list of data sets (DS...) in his post of Saturday 8th August ('Mongolian Variation Sequences Missing from Unicode 8.00 Code Chart', http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-mongolian/2015JulSep/0248.html
), we are missing two important items:

1) A reference scheme for rendering.  I offer one in the attachment rendering_framework.odt.

2) The rules for contextual forms that may be overridden by variation selectors.  Without these rules, we do not know whether we have an adequate set of variation selectors for rendering connected text.

I am trying to identify the contextual rules, though I am not the best person for the job.  NNBSP has me worried.  Do we need to identify suffix rules for every language that might conceivably be written in the Mongolian script with separated suffixes?


Received on Friday, 14 August 2015 10:14:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:07:05 UTC