- From: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 03:12:20 +0000
- To: "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 10 August 2015 03:14:01 UTC
If we have no further discussion on this, I suggest we ask the UTC to consider the following: Deprecate <U+1820-Medial><U+180C> and substitute <U+1820-Initial><U+180B>. > 2.) Deprecate <U+1828-Medial><U+180C> and substitute <U+1828-Final><U+180B>. > 3.) Deprecate <U+182C-Medial><U+180C> and substitute <U+182C-Final><U+180B>. > 4.) Deprecate <U+182C-Medial><U+180D> and substitute <U+182C-Final>. > 5.) Deprecate <U+182D-Medial><U+180C> and substitute <U+182D-Final><U+180D>. > 6.) Deprecate <U+1835-Medial><U+180B> and substitute <U+1835-Final><U+180B>. > 7.) Deprecate <U+1836-Medial><U+180C> and substitute <U+1836-Final>. This is not an argument that I am ready to die for. We need agreement firstly - even if it is not what one of us considers to be the best solution. We need to be aware, as font developers that these issues and differences of implementation do exist. Once we are done with the discussion at the UTC level, then we will move on. Richard Ishida, do you have suggestions on how to go forward with this? Thanks, Greg
Received on Monday, 10 August 2015 03:14:01 UTC