W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > July to September 2015

RE: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

From: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 18:20:48 +0000
To: "jrmt@almas.co.jp" <jrmt@almas.co.jp>, "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BN3PR10MB0321B95873D4A050AD5E1C22AF740@BN3PR10MB0321.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
OK, will look it over.
Thanks Jirimutu,
Greg


From: jrmt@almas.co.jp [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp]
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 4:45 PM
To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: RE: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

Hi Greg,

I have prepared our team's FVS discussion list.
Please find attached FVS_Discussion_List.pdf file and advice how should we go through the discussion.

We have only included the Traditional Mongolian part in this PDF file.
I will continue to create other parts of the Standards like Todo Mongolian, Sibe, Manchu and ALI GALI,
If you and members fell it helpful and efficient to sort out all of the discussion points.

This file is created by Microsoft Excel, if anyone need the original xlsx file,
Please download it from following URL.

http://www.mongolfont.com/w3c/FVS_Discussion_List.xlsx

I have also modified a little bit and included the basic principle list in the file, which is mentioned in my previous mail.
Please feel free to modify it or comment on it for correcting our Variant Mapping direction.

Thanks and Best Regards,

Jirimutu
==========================================================
Almas Inc.
101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp<mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp>   Mobile : 090-6174-6115
Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082
http://www.almas.co.jp/   http://www.compiere-japan.com/
==========================================================




From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net]
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 12:14 AM
To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org<mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Subject: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

We are winding down on the NNBSP discussion.

Let's go ahead with another topic as attached dealing with 6 FVS assignments. The basic issue is that the current specification says to make the assignment at one position whereas the glyph is processed by OT rulings at another position.

Greg
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2015 18:21:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:07:05 UTC