- From: siqin <siqin@almas.co.jp>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:43:24 +0900
- To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>, "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <55A5BABC.5080606@almas.co.jp>
Hi, Greg, The joined one is part of the prev word(verb), not Suffix. The seperate one is Suffix. SiqinBilige. On 2015/07/15 10:13, Greg Eck wrote: > > Thank you, Siqin, for the data on dag/deg. > > The first example is very helpful in showing the formation of the > double dag/deg. The first is joined. The second is separated. > > In this case, then, I would think that it definitely goes in the DS05 > – however it should be noted that sometimes it is joined and sometimes > separated by the NNBSP. > > I am updating DS05 now.** > > Greg > > *From:*siqin [mailto:siqin@almas.co.jp] > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 14, 2015 9:44 AM > *To:* jrmt@almas.co.jp; Greg Eck; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: NNBSP Impact > > Hi, Greg Eck , Jirimutu, > > There is some usage of dag,deg. > > SiqinBIlige. > > On 2015/07/12 17:36, jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > I have updated my discussion paper included you JUL 10’s comment > and added my discussion and declaration as well. > > (a little bit difference for the discussion on ACA | ECA) > > Please ignore NNBSP_Model_discussion_0712_updated.pdf what I have > sent out. > > The attached file NNBSP_Model_discussion_0712_updated_01.pdf is > correct one. > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > /Jirimutu/ > > /==========================================================/ > > /Almas Inc./ > > /101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo/ > > /E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> Mobile : > 090-6174-6115/ > > /Phone : 03-5688-2081, Fax : 03-5688-2082/ > > /http://www.almas.co.jp/ http://www.compiere-japan.com// > > /==========================================================/ > > *From:*Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net] > *Sent:* Saturday, July 11, 2015 1:39 AM > *To:* jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp>; > public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org <mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org> > *Subject:* RE: NNBSP Impact > > Mr. Jirimutu, > > I have responded to your NNBSP/MSS paper as attached. > > Thanks for your input. > Greg > > *From:* jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> > [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp] > *Sent:* Friday, July 10, 2015 1:25 AM > *To:* Greg Eck; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > <mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org> > *Subject:* RE: NNBSP Impact > > Hi Greg, > > Let me send out my updated document of NNBSP_Model_discussion.pdf. > > I have included Your response and added my comments as well as > additional discussion points. > > I am travelling in Inner Mongolia now and maybe my response will > be delayed in coming two weeks. > > I will find time to try to reply mail quickly. > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > /Jirimutu/ > > /==========================================================/ > > /Almas Inc./ > > /101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo/ > > /E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> Mobile : > 090-6174-6115/ > > /Phone : 03-5688-2081, Fax : 03-5688-2082/ > > /http://www.almas.co.jp/ http://www.compiere-japan.com// > > /==========================================================/ > > *From:*Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net] > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 8, 2015 10:30 PM > *To:* jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp>; > public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org <mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org> > *Cc:* 'Behdad Esfahbod' > *Subject:* NNBSP Impact > > I have included an initial response to Mr. Jirumutu’s paper > entitled _NNBSP_Model_discussion.pdf_. > > Comments are welcome. > > Also attached: > > DS00 – Standard Mongolian NNBSP Model (as updated) > > DS05 - detailing all known suffixes with NNBSP impact (updated as > requested by Mr. Jirimutu) > > Greg > > *From:* jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> > [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp] > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 7, 2015 8:25 PM > *To:* Greg Eck; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > <mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org> > *Cc:* 'Behdad Esfahbod' > *Subject:* RE: NNBSP-MVS Impact > > Hi Greg Eck, > > Thank you very much for your clarification. > > I understand your explanation for NNBSP status. > > I think there is three direction to select. > > 1.Add some supplementary definition to NNBSP to fit the Mongolian > Encoding requirement. (maybe it is impossible because of the other > languages) > > 2.Replace NNBSP usage in Mongolian with other Mongolian Block > character, as I mentioned for example U+180F > > 3.Bear the restriction of the NNBSP usage and consider to use > NNBSP in Mongolian encoding. > > (We need to persuade each application one by one to fit Mongolian > requirements just like Dr. Quejingzhabu had done with Microsoft) > > Anyone have good idea or solution to resolve the issue ? > > Anyway we need to continue to discuss the model to solve the > Mongolian Suffix Model either use NNBSP or other character. > > Let me send out my NNBSP Model Discussion paper to all members. In > the discussion paper, I have included the NNBSP replacement > proposals as well. > > If you do not agree it, just please ignore it and skip into > following discussion contents. > > I am also updated the MVS Model discussion paper and included > Greg’s response as well as my comments in it. > > Please let me know if anyone have any question about it. > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > /Jirimutu/ > > /==========================================================/ > > /Almas Inc./ > > /101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo/ > > /E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> Mobile : > 090-6174-6115/ > > /Phone : 03-5688-2081, Fax : 03-5688-2082/ > > /http://www.almas.co.jp/ http://www.compiere-japan.com// > > /==========================================================/ > > *From:*Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net] > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 7, 2015 5:57 PM > *To:* public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > <mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org> > *Cc:* 'Behdad Esfahbod' > *Subject:* RE: NNBSP-MVS Impact > > Mr. Jirimutu, > > I am not the one to answer about redefining the NNBSP since it is > defined by the Unicode Consortium. However, in reading the past > posts from Badral and others, it appears that redefinition would > be problematic at this point as it is tied to other languages such > as French and Russian – stabilization would be the issue. *Can > someone else answer this question as stated below?* > > I can represent Dr. Quejingzhabu in his request that upper-level > layout features in MS Word dealing with the NNBSP have been broken > for some time. I think we had a discussion on this at least two > years back. His bug report dealt with word-count across > NNBSP-bounded suffixes, along with CTL-RIGHT/CTL-LEFT word > skipping across the same NNBSP-bounded suffixes. > > Greg > > *Are there other problems that other some of you have found in > dealing with the current implementation of the NNBSP? Let’s see if > we can put together a list of problems found in the current NNBSP > implementation …* > > *Spell-checking – Badral* > > *Xxx – Mr. Jirimutu* > > *Word-count – Prof. Quejingzhabu* > > *Word-skip (CTL-RIGHT/LEFT) – Prof. Quejingzhabu* > > *…* > > ** > > *From:* jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> > [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp] > *Sent:* Monday, July 6, 2015 9:17 AM > *To:* Greg Eck; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > <mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org> > *Cc:* 'Behdad Esfahbod' > *Subject:* RE: NNBSP-MVS Impact > > Hi Greg Eck, > > Thank you very much. I appreciate your attention. > > I will prepare my discussion paper for NNBSP include our AAT > implementation logic. > > We are discussing in our team how to propose for NNBSP. I will > send our discussion paper in one or two days. > > As Mr. Badral’s mail, the NNBSP is the big problem in the > Mongolian Encodings now. > > Before explain our solution of NNBSP on AAT, > > I would like to ask if is it possible to redefine the Suffix Joiner ? > > If it is possible to redefine the Suffix Joiner, I would like to > propose U+180F to be the Mongolian Suffix Joiner. > > That will be pretty on the code structure and simple on the handle. > > If it is impossible to redefine, we have to use NNBSP, I would > like to participate into the discussion. > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > /Jirimutu/ > > /==========================================================/ > > /Almas Inc./ > > /101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo/ > > /E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> Mobile : > 090-6174-6115/ > > /Phone : 03-5688-2081, Fax : 03-5688-2082/ > > /http://www.almas.co.jp/ http://www.compiere-japan.com// > > /==========================================================/ > > *From:*Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net] > *Sent:* Monday, July 6, 2015 1:17 AM > *To:* jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp>; > public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org <mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org> > *Cc:* 'Behdad Esfahbod' > *Subject:* RE: NNBSP-MVS Impact > > Mr. Jirimutu, > > Thank you for the explanation on AAT’s handling of the character > preceding the MVS. > > Please do let us know how the character preceding the NNBSP is > handled also – that will be very helpful. > > Greg > > *From:* jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> > [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp] > *Sent:* Monday, July 6, 2015 12:04 AM > *To:* Greg Eck; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > <mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org> > *Cc:* 'Behdad Esfahbod' > *Subject:* RE: NNBSP-MVS Impact > > Hi Greg Eck, > > I would like to send my some discussion about the MVS today. > > I will follow up the NNBSP soon if I have any comment. > > *>It would be nice to find out whether Apple rendering systems > follow suit. * > > *>If anyone knows of an Apple engineer that we could ask, * > > *>I will follow up on the matter. Or if there are other rendering > systems >that we should consider, please bring them up.* > > ** > > We created the Apple AAT Font on our site and Apple handle this as > an static machine stream. > > In the case all of the rules we defined working well on Mac OS X > and iOS system. > > The MVS model processing on our AAT font is that > > the string <MONG_INITIAL><MONG_MEDIAL>< MONG_LETTER ><MVS><U+1820 > | U+1821> where MONG is the range U+1820 - U+18AA, > > Our font will tag the MONG_LETTER as <fina> only if the > <MONG_LETTER> is one of <U+1828-n>, <U+182C-n>, <U+182D-g>, > > <U+182E-m>, <U+182F-l>, <U+1830-s>, <U+1831-sh>, <U+1835-j>, > <U+1836-y>, <U+1837-r>, <U+1838-w> as well as > > <U+1823-o>, <U+1824-u>, <U+1825-oe>, <U+1826-ue>. Which Is the > Mongolian MVS requested characters. > > Note: Apple system site had one bug on the Mac OS X 10.8-10.10.2 > and iOS 8.0-8.2 > > rdar://problem/18483089> REGRESSION: iOS8 did not able to > correctly rendering Mongolian vowel separator(180E) > > this bug had been fixed on Mac OS X 10.10.3 and iOS 8.3 now. > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > /Jirimutu/ > > /==========================================================/ > > /Almas Inc./ > > /101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo/ > > /E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> Mobile : > 090-6174-6115/ > > /Phone : 03-5688-2081, Fax : 03-5688-2082/ > > /http://www.almas.co.jp/ http://www.compiere-japan.com// > > /==========================================================/ > > *From:*Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net] > *Sent:* Saturday, July 4, 2015 11:34 PM > *To:* public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > <mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org> > *Cc:* Behdad Esfahbod > *Subject:* RE: NNBSP-MVS Impact > > Behdad Esfahbod, as the Harfbuzz designer, was kind enough to > answer my questions of how Harfbuzz handles the MVS/NNBSP > context. He confirmed my understanding that Harfbuzz follows the > Microsoft Universal Shaping Engine in the following … *Thank you > Behdad* … > > >>>>> > > Given the string <MONG_INITIAL><MONG_MEDIAL>< MONG_LETTER > ><NNBSP><MONG_SUFFIX> where MONG is the range U+1820 - U+18AA, > Harfbuzz applies the <fina> tag applied to MONG_LETTER > > The same processing holds for <MONG_INITIAL><MONG_MEDIAL>< > MONG_LETTER ><MVS><U+1820 | U+1821> > > >>>>> > > *It would be nice to find out whether Apple rendering systems > follow suit. If anyone knows of an Apple engineer that we could > ask, I will follow up on the matter. Or if there are other > rendering systems that we should consider, please bring them up.* > > The DS00 charts have been updated. I am also attaching two files > that have been helpful to me in considering the range of usage of > the MVS / NNBSP. DS04 deals with MVS usage. DS05 deals with NNBSP > usage. *Comments/corrections/questions are welcome.* > > Let’s go on to consider six cases where the MVS/NNBSP affect the > shaping behavior of the character immediately preceeding/following > the MVS/NNBSP – U+1820, U+1828, U+182C, U+182D, U+1835, and U+1836. > > Greg Eck >
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: SampleOfDagDeg.pdf
Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2015 01:44:24 UTC