- From: Andrzej Zydron <azydron@xml-intl.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:41:33 +0100
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- Message-ID: <46F0E0BD.6020705@xml-intl.com>
Hi Everyone, Sorry for what might appear to be repetition of my previous post on this topic. Is it not possible to mention xml:tm as a viable way of achieving unique text identifiers. xml:tm is the only standard to date that references W3C ITS directly (in fact W3C ITS is mandated by xml:tm), and is most likely to be the main way in which the W3C ITS is actually used and implemented. It might be nice to reciprocate this in BP 18. Best Regards, AZ Felix Sasaki wrote: > > Hi Yves, > > Yves Savourel wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm working on my AI >> (http://www.w3.org/International/its/track/actions/21) >> >> One of the change to do is: >> >> >>> We should align this formulation >>> "Your DTD or schema should provide xml:id (or an equivalent mechanism)" >>> with BP 9, e.g. like: >>> "Your DTD or schema should provide xml:id (or a different attribute >>> to be of type ID)" >>> >> >> I would tend to disagree: why be more specific in this Author BP than >> the others? In BP 15, 16 and 17 are not specific about what >> exactly means 'equivalent'. >> > > Probably the case of BP 18 is different than BP 15, 16 or 17: in the > latter three BP, we assume different markup with the same > functionalities. In BP 18, however, the functionalities of unique > identifiers can be rather different (although all share the purpose of > unique identification). See as an example of a different functionality > the mention of xs:unique/xs:key by Jirka at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2007JulSep/0075.html > >> The authors don't really give a vole's pattouti about what are the >> specifics of the equivalent mechanism (or of xml:id for that >> matter). >> > Probably the differences between its:translate vs. e.g. the "dita" > translate attribute (see BP 17) are not so large, compared to > differences between xml:id vs. xs:unique/xs:key . Hence, we thought > that in BP 9 and BP 18 the alignment and actual repetition of material > is rather helpful to the reader. > > Felix > > -- email - azydron@xml-intl.com smail - c/o Mr. A.Zydron PO Box 2167 Gerrards Cross Bucks SL9 8XF United Kingdom Mobile +(44) 7966 477 181 FAX +(44) 1753 480 465 www - http://www.xml-intl.com This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you may not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. Unless explicitly stated otherwise this message is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer.
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2007 08:41:45 UTC