- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:19:45 +0200
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Received on Monday, 10 September 2007 06:19:25 UTC
Felix Sasaki wrote: > We should align this formulation > "Your DTD or schema should provide xml:id (or an equivalent mechanism)" > with BP 9, e.g. like: > "Your DTD or schema should provide xml:id (or a different attribute to > be of type ID)" We might even consider using more general statement like: Your DTD or schema should provide xml:id (or different means for assigning unique identifier to each element) Using ID type might be limiting due its limited lexical space. Some schemas could use more complex or compound identifiers defined by xs:unique/xs:key. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 10 September 2007 06:19:25 UTC