- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:46:41 +0900
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, public-i18n-its@w3.org
At 08:02 07/01/28, Felix Sasaki wrote: > >Hi all, > >This is my AI >[PENDING] ACTION: Felix to post a proposal for both attribute notations >on the span element. [recorded in >http://www.w3.org/2007/01/24-i18nits-minutes.html#action02] > >Below is the text. I would put it in section 5.2.2 after >"Local selection in XML documents is realized with local ITS attributes, >the ruby element, or the span element. span serves just as a wrapper >for the local ITS attributes and ruby." I think the word "wrapper" doesn't work here. The span element wrapps its contents, not the its attributes. If ruby elements are indeed placed inside span, the term may be appropriate in that case. I think "carrier" is better for attributes, but somebody may have an even better idea. Regards, Martin. #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2007 00:41:12 UTC