- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:45:15 +0900
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Hi Yves, all, The order you are proposing sounds good to me. However, I would change ----- 2- Global selections in documents (using a rules element): 2.a- Any rules inside the rules element 2.b- Any rules linked via the XLink href attribute 3- Global selections in an external file (using a rules element), linked via a tool-specific mechanism ----- to ----- 2- Global selections in documents (using a rules element): 3- Global selections in an external file (using a rules element): 3.a- Any rules linked via the XLink href attribute 3.b- Any rules linked via a tool-specific mechanism ----- Since both 3.a and 3.b are about rules from external files. Felix Yves Savourel wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I had the action item "Yves to rewrite sec. 5.4" to do > (http://www.w3.org/2007/01/10-i18nits-minutes.html#action08) > > > It's actually just a re-wording of the numbered list. We currently have: > > ----- > "The following precedence order is defined for selections of ITS > information in various positions (the first item in the list has the > highest precedence): > > 1- Implicit local selection in documents (ITS local attributes on a > specific element) > > 2- Global selections in documents (using a rules element) > > 3- Global selections in an external file (using a rules element), linked > via the XLink href attribute or a different mechanism > > 4- Selections via defaults for data categories, see Section 6.1: > Position, Defaults, Inheritance and Overriding of Data Categories" > ----- > > I think the #3 is incorrect as it puts the linked rules in the same > category as the external rules. Linked rules should be treated just like > rules inside the document, as if they were the first rules in the > <rules> element where they are called. > > I propose to change the bullets #2 and #3 as this: > > ----- > 2- Global selections in documents (using a rules element): > 2.a- Any rules inside the rules element > 2.b- Any rules linked via the XLink href attribute > > 3- Global selections in an external file (using a rules element), linked > via a tool-specific mechanism > ----- > > An example of the distinction between 2.a and 2.b is in one of our test > file: > http://www.w3.org/International/its/tests/inputdata/LocNote2.xml > The linked rules define a 'description' note for all @alt attributes > Then a rule inside the <rules> element where the link is overrides this > for one specific @alt with a 'alert' note. > > Cheers, > -yves > > >
Received on Friday, 12 January 2007 08:57:32 UTC