RE: Comment on http://www.w3.org/International/its/techniques/its-techniques.html#DevRuby (BP7) from Yves Savourel on 2007-06-26 (public-i18n-its@w3.org from April to June 2007)

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 08:15:08 -0600
To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Message-ID: <008901c7b7fc$66f25e70$2b32a8c0@BREIZH>

>> "In this document the rubyBlock element is similar to its:ruby, 
>> rBase is similar to its:rb, rParen is similar to its:rp, rText and 
>> is similar to its:rt."
> I think "is similar" could be replaced by "has the same functionality as".

How about:

"In this document the rubyBlock element has the same functionality as its:ruby, rBase as its:rb, rParen as its:rp, and rText as
its:rt"


> Regarding the editors note "need more info", 
> I would point people to sec. 1 of the ruby 
> TR http://www.w3.org/TR/ruby/#intro .

Good point.

We should also add the Ruby TR to the reference list.


Cheers,
-yves

Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 14:14:37 UTC