- From: Lieske, Christian <christian.lieske@sap.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:40:55 +0200
- To: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Dear all, After having received some information from Felix on IRC, I suggest to change Felix' proposal related to directionality as follows: --- The values of the Directionality data category rely on properties of text as defined by [CSS 2.1] or its successor: "ltr": Left-to-right text. The effect of this value is defined by the CSS2-1 rule * { unicode-bidi: embed; direction: ltr} "rtl": Right-to-left text. The effect of this value is defined by the CSS2-1 rule * { unicode-bidi: embed; direction: rtl} "lro": Left-to-right override. The effect of this value is defined by the CSS2-1 rule * { unicode-bidi: bidi-override; direction: ltr} "rlo": Right-to-left override. The effect of this value is defined by the CSS2-1 rule * { unicode-bidi: bidi-override; direction: rtl} <p dir="ltr"> thus for example defines the directionality of a certain p element and its child elements. Note: ITS only defines general inheritance of directionality. By contrast, [CSS 2.1] or its successor define behavior which goes beyond this behavior. [CSS 2.1] for example defines specific inheritance and differentiates between block and inline elements. Applications with implement the Directionality data category are encouraged to implemented the more comprehensive behavior defined in [CSS 2.1]. --- The changes related to Ruby look alright to me. Cheers, Christian -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Lieske, Christian Gesendet: Monday, September 25, 2006 11:19 AM An: Felix Sasaki; public-i18n-its@w3.org Betreff: AW: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11 Hi Felix, Thanks for working on the action item. I guess I am lacking some knowledge to understand http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#directionality-definition I wonder for example whether [dir="ltr"] { unicode-bidi: embed; direction: ltr} is valid CSS. Wrt. http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3466 I have to admit they I have lost track of the relationship between Ruby and ITS which is currently supported by the spec. Regards, Christian -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Felix Sasaki Gesendet: Sunday, September 24, 2006 3:39 AM An: public-i18n-its@w3.org Betreff: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11 Hi all, I implemented issue 3466, which includes: - action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 Felix to draft a text for the CSS issue. See http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#directionality-definition for the text. - action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11 Felix to implement http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3466. This encompasses a subsection 3.5 on "Usage of Internationalized Resource Identifiers in ITS", the delition of conformance clause 2-2 for ruby / directionality , and the change of references (Ruby and directionality are only non-normative referenced now). Cheers, Felix
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 17:22:09 UTC