Re: AW: Features at risk

Hi Christian,

Lieske, Christian wrote:
> Hi Felix,
> 
> So "feature at risk" is everything for which we do not get two implementations?

Yes.

 Are there other criteria?

No.

Cheers,

Felix

> 
> Regards,
> Christian
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Felix Sasaki
> Gesendet: Saturday, September 23, 2006 3:01 AM
> An: public-i18n-its@w3.org
> Betreff: Features at risk
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Yves and me had a discussion on what we will implement or not. Yves wrote:
> 
> [[I'm planning on implementing with (for real application)
> - Translate
> - Localization Note
> - Element Within Text
> 
> - Terminology is also implemeneted but that not have a real application
> so far.
> 
> Maybe (not not sure at all):
> - Language Information
> - Directionality
> 
> Not:
> - Ruby
> 
>>From what I think, it seems Ruby, Directionality, and Language
> Information are the features the most at risk.]]
> 
> I will implement everything, but if we don't have somebody who promises
> to make another implementation for Ruby, Directionality, and Language
> Information, these need to be marked as features at risk.
> 
> Note that "implementation" means not necessarily to do something useful,
> but to generate a result format like :
> <nodeList datacat="languageInformation">
>   <node path="/Manual" outputType="no-value">
>    <output/>
>   </node>[...]
>   <node path="/Manual/Section[1]/Ltitle[1]/Mtitle[1]/MultiCol[1]"
> outputType="new-value-global">
>    <output myLangAttr="en"/>
>   </node>[...]
>   <node
> path="/Manual/Section[1]/Ltitle[1]/Mtitle[1]/MultiCol[1]/Text[1]/@addInfo"
> outputType="inherited">
>    <output myLangAttr="en"/>
>   </node>[...]</nodeList>
> </nodeList>
> 
> Sebastian, others: who could do that for Ruby, Directionality, and
> Language Information?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Felix
> 
>

Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 09:29:47 UTC