- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:18:32 +0900
- To: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > I _could_ do this, but I am worried that my implementation is too similar > to yours, Felix. Do you think they are different enough to qualify? I will re-implement my stuff in Java. I wanted to do this anyway, to make be able to provide ITS as a web service. > > My assumption was that I would make multiple passes > in a pipeline to implement everything; ie have a "flattening" stage > for each data category which returned a decorated tree, ready to > send to the next stage and then finally produce a report. The same as my strategy, but since I will do it in Java, there is no need to worry. This sounds good! If we have two implementations of everything, all features will go through CR ... Felix
Received on Sunday, 24 September 2006 23:18:43 UTC