- From: Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:04:27 -0700
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
- CC: "'Richard Ishida'" <ishida@w3.org>, "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>, www-i18n-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org, public-i18n-its@w3.org
Really I think you ought to use the latest reference. RFC 4646 is published and can be referenced. Pointing to the older, obsolete, RFC may confuse people needlessly. Your current text says: -- Applying the Language Information data category to xml:lang attributes using global rules is not necessary, since xml:lang is already defined in terms of RFC3066 or its successor. -- It might be better to append a note to that sentence: -- Applying the Language Information data category to xml:lang attributes using global rules is not necessary, since xml:lang is already defined in terms of RFC3066 or its successor. (RFC4646 is the successor to RFC 3066.) -- Best Regards, Addison Yves Savourel wrote: > Hi Richard, > > The reference has been changed to 'RFC3066 or its successor' with a link to a reference to the "Language Identification" section of > the XML specification. > See http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#langinfo-definition > > Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't hear from you , we will assume this issue as closed. > > Cheers, > -yves > > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Richard Ishida > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 1:09 PM > To: 'Felix Sasaki' > Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org; public-i18n-its@w3.org > Subject: RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please > > > Personal comment: > > "Applying the language information data category to xml:lang attributes using global rules is not necessary, since xml:lang is > already defined in terms of [RFC 4646]." > > Strictly speaking xml is defined in terms of RFC 3066 or its successor. It may be better to say "in terms of [BCP 47]" at this > location. If not, you should add, or it's successor. (Bear in mind that RFC 4646bis is just around the corner, relatively > speaking.) > > RI > > -- Addison Phillips Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc. Internationalization is an architecture. It is not a feature.
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2006 17:04:51 UTC