- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:58:09 +0100
- To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-i18n-comments@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
"The language information data category provides for rules to be expressed at a global level because it is unnecessary locally. Locally users are able to use xml:lang..." I suggest: "The language information data category only provides for rules to be expressed at a global level. Locally users are able to use xml:lang..." The 'because it is unnecessary locally' is a little confusing - it can temporarily lead the reader to think that local language declarations are not necessary. RI ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ http://www.w3.org/International/ http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] > Sent: 11 September 2006 01:51 > To: ishida@w3.org > Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org; > public-i18n-its@w3.org > Subject: Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang > > Hello i18n core, > > This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See > also http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3480 for > our discussion . > > Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement > it. Please have a look at > http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#l > anginfo-implementation > . > > Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we > don't hear from you , we will assume this issue as closed. > > Regards, > > Felix > > ishida@w3.org wrote: > > Comment from the i18n review of: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/ > > > > Comment 4 > > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ > > Editorial/substantive: E > > Owner: RI > > > > Location in reviewed document: > > 6.7.1 > > > > Comment: > > The explanation of the language information data category > should clarify that this only provides for rules to be > expressed at a global level because it is assumed that it > would be unnecessary locally. Locally users would be able to > use xml:lang (which is defined by XML) or an attribute > specific to the format in question (as in Example 33). > > > > > > The XML spec acts in a way like an ever present provider of > certain global rules defining such things as xml:lang. > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 17:58:30 UTC