- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:06:16 +0900
- To: ishida@w3.org
- Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org, public-i18n-its@w3.org
Hello i18n core, This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3500 for our discussion. Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement it. Please have a look at http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#selection-local , especially example 15: "Note that xml:lang indicates only the language, not the directionality." Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't hear from you , we will assume this issue as closed. Regards, Felix ishida@w3.org wrote: > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/ > > Comment 28 > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ > Editorial/substantive: E > Owner: RI > > Location in reviewed document: > 6.5.2 > > Comment: > GEO WG regularly has to clarify for people that language declarations and directionality markup are very different things - including a long and draw out discussion with DITA folks. It seems dangerous to introduce an example here that seems to the uninitiated to say that the language markup is defining the application of the directionality markup. > > > In particular since the xpath expression probably doesn't need to go that far anyway for a reasonable example. It could just say /body/p[1]/quote or //quote[23] or some such. > > > >
Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 03:06:38 UTC