- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:30:40 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3506
Summary: Make the application of legacy ruby clearer
Product: ITS
Version: WorkingDraft
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ITS tagset
AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org
ReportedBy: fsasaki@w3.org
QAContact: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Issue #36 of i18nCore comments
http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
It is very poorly explained what the difference is between this and the
situation described in the last para of 6.6.2.
How about:
"Where legacy formats do no contain ruby markup conformant to [Ruby-TR], it is
still possible to associate ruby text with a specified range of document
content using the rubyRule element."
Note also s/and there one wants/and where one wants/
Received on Wednesday, 19 July 2006 17:31:02 UTC