- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:30:40 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3506 Summary: Make the application of legacy ruby clearer Product: ITS Version: WorkingDraft Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ITS tagset AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org ReportedBy: fsasaki@w3.org QAContact: public-i18n-its@w3.org Issue #36 of i18nCore comments http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ It is very poorly explained what the difference is between this and the situation described in the last para of 6.6.2. How about: "Where legacy formats do no contain ruby markup conformant to [Ruby-TR], it is still possible to associate ruby text with a specified range of document content using the rubyRule element." Note also s/and there one wants/and where one wants/
Received on Wednesday, 19 July 2006 17:31:02 UTC