- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:58:24 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3466
Summary: Existing ruby markup
Product: ITS
Version: LastCall
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ITS tagset
AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org
ReportedBy: ysavourel@translate.com
QAContact: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Issue #35 of i18nCore comments:
http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
Section 6.6.2: It's not abundantly clear from the text, but i think you mean to
say, in the last para, that there are a set of global rules for associating
markup that *conforms to Ruby-TR* with ruby concepts. Please make that clearer,
and make it clearer that these global rules *do not apply* if the target markup
is not identical to or a conformant subset of Ruby-TR.
I'm also wondering whether XHTML 1.1 would need such global rules. If it does,
it would be a good example to cite.
Received on Friday, 14 July 2006 19:59:33 UTC