- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:58:24 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3466 Summary: Existing ruby markup Product: ITS Version: LastCall Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ITS tagset AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org ReportedBy: ysavourel@translate.com QAContact: public-i18n-its@w3.org Issue #35 of i18nCore comments: http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ Section 6.6.2: It's not abundantly clear from the text, but i think you mean to say, in the last para, that there are a set of global rules for associating markup that *conforms to Ruby-TR* with ruby concepts. Please make that clearer, and make it clearer that these global rules *do not apply* if the target markup is not identical to or a conformant subset of Ruby-TR. I'm also wondering whether XHTML 1.1 would need such global rules. If it does, it would be a good example to cite.
Received on Friday, 14 July 2006 19:59:33 UTC