- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:15:31 +0900
- To: Yves Savourel <yves@opentag.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4429EDC3.2090408@w3.org>
Yves Savourel wrote: > Hi felix, > >>> Mmmm... I guess langMap and localeMap stay named like this >>> while the other change to xyzPointer/PassThrough/Etc. >> no, I would change everything to "pointer", hence: its:langPointer . >> ... >>> One question: if >>> the content of langMap is always an attribute, why the '@'? Is the >>> value an XPath expression or the name of the equivalent attribute/element? >> an XPath expression. It has the same meaning as all "pointer" >> attributes: an XPath expression relative to the node(s) selected >> by its:select, e.g. > > Ok, so it's not a 'true map'. It just passes on the language value. > This means it could point to an element as well. OK. > > >> <ns1:p myLangAtt=".."> ... >> would be >> <its:langRule its:select="//ns1:p" its:langPointer="//@myLangAtt"/> > > You probably mean "@myLangAtt" (otherwise it's not relative). ah, sure. > > >> Below the corrected syntax. A question: What is >> the latest state for withinTextRule? > > For now, like you have it. > We need to test it to see if it needs an extra attribute for 'sub-flow'. o.k. Do you have a text on this which we could use for the draft? > > -yves >
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2006 02:15:44 UTC