- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:00:28 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3050 ------- Comment #5 from fsasaki@w3.org 2006-03-27 22:00 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > <its:rulesLink> sounds good to me. > > One question: Where does it go? stand-alone (wherever the host format allows > it)? or as the first entry in a <its:documentRules>? I think it would not make sense in <its:documentRules>. Rather standalone. > > For being sure we look at all the possibilities: > > - This link could be also done or as a standalone attribute: <myDoc > its:link="href"> I would prefer XLink, as Sebastian proposed at http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3050#c3 . > > - Or as a PI (like for CSS): <?its-rules href="file.xml" ?> > > The PI has the advantage of working everywhere (always valid even in DTD-based > formats). What do you mean by "valid"? Processable? That would be the case with XLink too. > (In reply to comment #3) > Then maybe using XLink's simple link would be better: not re-inventing > something and keeping it processable by simple tools. I'm not very familiar > with XLink but it seems we should be able to do: > > <its:link xlink:href="someRules.xml"/> > ++1
Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 22:00:33 UTC