- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 12:23:46 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3017 ------- Comment #9 from fsasaki@w3.org 2006-03-27 12:23 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Since we don't have local rules, saying <globalRules> seems > redundant to me. The discussion in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0301.html > about distinguishing local from global is not relevant, > as there is no local corollary of <globalRules>. Using > the word "global" raises falses expectations. > > I'd go for <ITSRules>, on the grounds that > these elements may appear in an instance document's > header section, and its nice if they are human > parseable. > > Sebastian > If I count right that means rules: Christian(?), Sebastian, Yves global something: Felix which means I'm out. Rules would be o.k. with me, so <its:rules>.
Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 12:23:53 UTC