[I18N ITS editor's call] Teleconference Minutes 2006-03-24

.. are at

http://www.w3.org/2006/03/24-i18nits-minutes.html

and below as text.

- Felix


   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                i18n ITS working group (editor's call)

24 Mar 2006

   See also: [2]IRC log

      [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/03/24-i18nits-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Christian, Diane, Felix, Yves

   Regrets
   Chair
          Yves

   Scribe
          Felix

Contents

     * [3]Topics
         1. [4]today's topics
         2. [5]richard's change proposals
         3. [6]sec. 2.2. of Richard's proposal
         4. [7]techniques document
     * [8]Summary of Action Items
     _________________________________________________________

today's topics

   christian: my proposal: Richard's input on an overview section
   ... then the question: should we continue talking about data
   categories?
   ... a related topic: the name "tag" inside "internationalization tag
   set"

   felix: another possible topic:
   [9]http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset-diff-2006
   0222.html
   ... how about reviewing change proposals in later calls

      [9]
http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset-diff-20060222.html

richard's change proposals

   [10]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0
   252.html

     [10]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0252.html

   Christian: I would adopt SECTION 1.1, as Richard proposed

   yves: do we need so extensive changes in sec. 2?

   christian: maybe the title of the section does not fit with the
   content
   ... what we currently have on basic concepts are really ITS concepts
   ... Richard describes ITS use cases
   ... it is identical until 2.2.

   felix: we might need sections for ITS users, and ITS implementors
   ... Richard wrote about users, Christian for implementors?

   christian: ITS usage scenarios would make sense
   ... I would adopt the whole section 2.1

   yves: as a section before 1.2?

   christian: yes
   ... or 1.1?

   Diane: before the examples

   yves: so: 2.1 of Richard as new section 1.1

sec. 2.2. of Richard's proposal

   yves: a lot of rewriting necessary

   [11]http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2882

     [11] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2882

   [12]http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2883

     [12] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2883

   yves: should the spec contain lot's of explanatory parts?

   christian: it should have
   ... my basic concepts section describe ITS from the perspective of
   our own work
   ... Richard describes how stuff could be used

   yves: is it possible to mix the sections?

   christian: I'd take Richard's 2.1 and 2.2
   ... and turn this into our new 1.1., with the title usage scenarios

   diane: some if it is out of date

   felix: how about having Christian and Richard as the main
   responsibles for ITS "explanation"?

   christian: how about writing a mail to Richard, saying what we
   change?
   ... if he is o.k. with that, the editor's would need to ensure that
   stuff is implemented

   felix: how about dividing the work between normative and
   non-normative parts?
   ... christian and Richard could work on that

techniques document

   christian: we should push the group to look at the things in
   bugzilla

   <scribe> ACTION: Yves to post a mail to start a thread about
   localization properties [recorded in
   [13]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/24-i18nits-minutes.html#action01]

   felix: don't we do too much, then we discuss many other issues?

   yves: maybe it does not need the same participation

   <scribe> ACTION: felix to make a time schedule including all bugs
   [recorded in
   [14]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/24-i18nits-minutes.html#action02]

Summary of Action Items

   [NEW] ACTION: felix to make a time schedule including all bugs
   [recorded in
   [15]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/24-i18nits-minutes.html#action02]
   [NEW] ACTION: Yves to post a mail to start a thread about
   localization properties [recorded in
   [16]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/24-i18nits-minutes.html#action01]
   [End of minutes]
     _________________________________________________________


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version 1.127
    ([18]CVS log)
    $Date: 2006/03/24 16:25:20 $

     [17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/