- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:37:21 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3000 ------- Comment #2 from ysavourel@translate.com 2006-03-22 16:37 ------- This issue (Bug #3000) is one of the topic for discussion this week (and decision at the Wed Mar-29 teleconference). Summary: We have decided (during the Sophia face-to-face I think) to address extensibility in ITS by simply letting users use their own namespaces. The question here is: - Do we need to have "extension points" (place where attributes and/or element of non-ITS namepsace are allowed) formally specified in our schemas? (so one can validate ITS markup). - And if so, where in <its:documentRules> and its children these extension points should be? -yves
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:37:25 UTC