- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 21:44:10 +0900
- To: Yves Savourel <yves@opentag.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2006 12:44:41 UTC
Yves Savourel wrote:
>> What we still would need is a modularization XHTML+ITS,
>> like Sebastian did for ITS and I did it for XML Spec.
>> But that can wait, I guess.
>
> I'll try to do that. But I'm not sure we can. TEI, DocBook and DITA allow for modification of the their DTDs as far as I understand,
> while XHTML's is pretty much fixed. We would be able to do this in XHTML 1.1 with their modularization.
You are right. We should mention it in the
>
>
>>> <!-- Elements within text -->
>>> <its:withinTextRule its:selector="//h:abbr | //h:acronym | //h:br |
>>> //h:cite"/> <its:withinTextRule its:selector="//h:code | //h:dfn
>>> //h:em | //h:strike | //h:u"/>
>> Did you decide here to go without the "yes" ("no") attribute?
>
> No I just forgot to put it back (at some point today I simplified the file using your DTD notation). They should all be
> its:withinText='yes'.
>
>
> -ys
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2006 12:44:41 UTC