- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 21:44:10 +0900
- To: Yves Savourel <yves@opentag.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2006 12:44:41 UTC
Yves Savourel wrote: >> What we still would need is a modularization XHTML+ITS, >> like Sebastian did for ITS and I did it for XML Spec. >> But that can wait, I guess. > > I'll try to do that. But I'm not sure we can. TEI, DocBook and DITA allow for modification of the their DTDs as far as I understand, > while XHTML's is pretty much fixed. We would be able to do this in XHTML 1.1 with their modularization. You are right. We should mention it in the > > >>> <!-- Elements within text --> >>> <its:withinTextRule its:selector="//h:abbr | //h:acronym | //h:br | >>> //h:cite"/> <its:withinTextRule its:selector="//h:code | //h:dfn >>> //h:em | //h:strike | //h:u"/> >> Did you decide here to go without the "yes" ("no") attribute? > > No I just forgot to put it back (at some point today I simplified the file using your DTD notation). They should all be > its:withinText='yes'. > > > -ys > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2006 12:44:41 UTC