- From: Sebastian Rahtz <Sebastian.Rahtz@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:16:38 +0000
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: Yves Savourel <yves@opentag.com>, public-i18n-its@w3.org
Felix Sasaki wrote: >> In other words: the selector points to one or more nodes, we apply the >> ITS property there. If there are already ITS properties >> applied in some children of these nodes are they overriden or not? >> that depends on the order of the rules. if //y comes after //x//y then the second rule wins > I would say you don't need to do an override: In my XQuery > implementation, XPath expressions like "//text[@localize='no']" are > interpreted as "//text[@localize='no']/descendant-or-self::*". How about > you, Sebastian? I don't think I agree. My view is that only "translate" is inherited, not "localize". I think the selector should be "//text//*" for localize, if that is really want is meant. Or do we expect "localize" to be inherited? -- Sebastian Rahtz *Open Source and Sustainability* 10-12 April 2006, Oxford http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk/events/2006-04-10-12/ Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431 OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 12:18:31 UTC